Search for: "End Citizens United PAC v. FEC" Results 1 - 20 of 35
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Sep 2011, 3:03 am by Michael Kang, guest-blogger
The title of the article is deliberately provocative and signals its identification of Citizens United v. [read post]
2 Nov 2023, 6:10 am by Unknown
The bill, Ending Corporate Influence on Elections Act of 2023, would “begin to undo” the Supreme Court’s 2010 decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 1:39 pm by Rick Hasen
Herrnson’s research shows that by the end of 2010 – less than 12 months after the landmark Citizens United v. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 10:48 am by Rick Hasen
FEC (in a portion of the opinion not touched by Citizens United), even Justice Kennedy voted to uphold key parts of the ban on elected officials soliciting unlimited funds to benefit their political parties. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 6:28 am by Adam Chandler
The New York Times examines “the increasingly blurry line between presidential candidates and the so-called Super PACs that have proliferated” in the wake of the Court’s 2010 decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 1:07 pm by Haley Proctor
Thus, after the Clerk of the Court entered default against the FEC, End Citizens United moved for default judgment. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 12:42 pm
  I'll have more to day about the case--Citizens United v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 12:14 pm by Kiran Bhat
The editorial board of The New York Times criticized the Court’s decisions in Citizens United, Arizona Free Enterprise Club’s Freedom PAC v. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 9:45 am by Gordon Todd
Much is poured into the Court’s 2010 decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 8:50 am by Jon Markman
MTP urged that the Supreme Court’s decision in Citizens United effectively overruled the Red Lion line of cases. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 2:02 pm by Jared Beck
(Citizens United itself overruled a 20-year old precedent, Austin v. [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 9:11 pm by Lyle Denniston
It has been nearly four years since the Supreme Court set off a constitutional revolution in the financing of federal elections, in Citizens United v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 6:25 am by Mandelman
  The Supreme Court, in Citizens United v. the FEC, correctly ruled that Congress may not ban political speech based on the identity of the speaker. [read post]