Search for: "England v. Department of Defense"
Results 41 - 60
of 189
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jan 2015, 4:31 pm
Plaintiffs further rely on the Appellate Division, First Department's decision in Vanarthros v. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 4:30 pm
Plaintiffs further rely on the Appellate Division, First Department's decision in Vanarthros v. [read post]
13 May 2009, 7:33 am
He also argued that manufacturers brought the express preemption defense to fore and that it was a more recent phenomena since the mid 1990s, after the Cipollone v. [read post]
13 May 2011, 9:44 am
The jury convicted, and the defendant argued that it was legal error to deny him his defense. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 6:05 pm
Gates, the Secretary of the United States Department of Defense (collectively “the Navy”). [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 7:30 am
Case No.: 6:07-cv-839-Orl-35-KRS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et. al., Respondents. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 1:18 pm
There have been cases in which an attorney established this discrepancy him or herself, such as U.S. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 4:23 am
Verizon New England Inc., No. 09-1214, 2010 WL 431873, at *5 (1st Cir. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 4:30 am
Tersigni v. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 3:58 am
On or about August 8, 2011, DOJ contacted MIX's criminal defense attorney to schedule a time to question MIX. 14. [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 7:29 am
Supreme Court to hear arguments in the Kaley v. [read post]
14 May 2011, 3:49 am
; Holder v. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 11:13 am
Justice Kennedy with opinion in Murr v. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 1:54 pm
That institution had a long history in England, but it can be summarized briefly.[10] Sometime before or shortly after the Norman Conquest of England in 1066, there was an English administrative department called the Chancery. [read post]
23 May 2011, 5:00 am
From a complaint filed last week in San Francisco: Michael M ____ v. [read post]
14 Apr 2022, 12:56 pm
The case of Ukraine v. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 12:31 am
NationalJournal.com – Obama Won’t Go to Court Over Defense of Marriage Act President Obama believes that the Defense of Marriage Act is unconstitutional and will no longer defend the 15 year old law in federal court, the Justice Department announced today. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 9:57 am
Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jul 2016, 2:15 pm
In Atwater v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 7:51 am
Department of Public Health case in 2008, which brought marriage to Connecticut, and co-counseled in the Baker v. [read post]
