Search for: "England v. Department of Defense" Results 81 - 100 of 189
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Dec 2021, 9:15 am by Richard Hunt
On December 6 the Department of Justice entered a Consent Decree in Self, Inc. et al v. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 8:48 pm by Camilla Alexandra Hrdy
 (Mossoff, 4) ("[A] public right is a privilege granted to or created in a citizen 'in connection with the performance of the constitutional functions of the executive or legislative departments.' ") (quoting Crowell v. [read post]
16 Oct 2016, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
Japan The Osaka High Court has dismissed an appeal filed by Defense Minister Tomomi Inada in a defamation lawsuit against a magazine. [read post]
29 Oct 2011, 2:33 pm
Plaintiffs subsequently moved for sanctions against defense counsel for his statements. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 6:15 am by Marty Lederman
The matter was then referred to the Department of Justice for an advisory recommendation, as the regulations of the time prescribed. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 1:31 pm by Sam Murrant
AT v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 42 (07 February 2012). [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 6:47 pm by My name
            [1] Jacoby & Meyers, LLP v. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 8:27 pm by Veronika Gaertner
Chaffe the English Court of Appeal finally raised doubts whether there was a wrongful removal of the child from England to the French overseas department La Réunion at all. [read post]
15 Mar 2008, 4:10 am
One group, led by former Attorneys General Janet Reno and Nicholas Katzenbach, stresses the decades during which their Department supported the view that the Amendment did not embrace a private, individual right — and notes that the Department put that argument before the Supreme Court when it last examined the Amendment’s meaning: U.S. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 4:26 pm by Badrinath Srinivasan
” Such agreements have been recognized as valid by various courts in USA such as in Department of Labor v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 6:51 pm by Matt Cameron
The First Circuit’s decision in Massachusetts v. [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 4:29 pm by INFORRM
He argued that it is defensible because the facts are mainly true. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 7:20 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
They offer additional discussion of “the deviation from employment defense” as well as horseplay. [read post]