Search for: "England v. Terris"
Results 1 - 20
of 68
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Feb 2012, 11:29 pm
Back in September 2011, a claim by Rio Ferdinand arising out of the publication of an article about his communications with a former girlfriend ([2011] EWHC 2454 (QB)) was defeated in part by the public interest arising as a result of Mr Ferdinand’s “appointment as captain of England, first, on a temporary basis, in March 2008 and then in replacement of John Terry in February 2010” [87] This was, of course, the result of an earlier privacy case involving John… [read post]
26 Feb 2007, 10:00 pm
" Minnesota v. [read post]
12 Jun 2010, 11:31 am
FINAL - USA 1, England 1. [read post]
24 Sep 2012, 6:44 am
The case concerns an incident in the Chelsea v QPR game last season when Terry is alleged to have made racist remarks.But hasn’t he already been cleared? [read post]
11 Sep 2010, 5:14 am
Put shortly, in England, “Pastor” Jones would have been arrested or otherwise restricted from his provocative conduct. [read post]
24 Jul 2016, 4:23 pm
As I wrote in my most recent post, Fuchs v. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 2:18 pm
This followed the sacking of John Terry after his notorious unsuccessful injunction application ([2010] EWHC 119 (QB)). [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 10:10 am
On 18 June 2010 Ms Justice Mary Irvine gave judgment in the Irish High Court in the case of Murray v. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 2:20 am
In his 2010 judgment in Terry (formerly LNS) v Persons Unknown ([2010] EWHC 119 (QB), [2010] EMLR 16) Mr Justice Tugendhat dismissed a claim for a super-injunction by the then England football captain John Terry, taking the opportunity to conduct a wide ranging survey of the relevant law and to criticise the approach of the claimant’s lawyers. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 4:19 pm
Marley v. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 10:32 am
In the recent case of Terry (previously ‘LNS’) v Persons Unknown ([2010] EWHC 119 (QB)) the court addressed the inter-relationship between two principles: the principle that the court may grant an interim injunction to restrain a threatened misuse of private information where the claimant can show that his claim is (at least) more likely than not to succeed, and the rule in Bonnard v Perryman ([1891] 2 Ch 269 (CA)) whereby the court almost invariably will not… [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 2:31 am
This followed the sacking of John Terry after his notorious unsuccessful injunction application ([2010] EWHC 119 (QB)). [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 7:26 am
I will do my best to avoid vitriol and superlatives, but I make no promises due to on my native New England roots. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 8:21 am
The following contribution to our arbitration symposium is written by Terry F. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 3:00 am
Co. v. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 4:27 pm
On 17 September 2019, The Sun published a story about the England cricketer Ben Stokes and his family. [read post]
28 Feb 2008, 7:24 am
Case Name: Large v. [read post]
28 Feb 2008, 7:24 am
Case Name: Large v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 11:49 am
Friday 9-10:30, Room KC 305 Loyalty & Confidences, Presenters Kathleen Clark, Brent Cotter, Carol Needham & Margaret Tarkington, Panel Chair Jim Varro 10:45-12:15, Room KC 203 Global Comparisons II, Presenters Donna Buckingham, John Law, Judy McMorrow & Michael Ogwezzy, Panel Chair Jeff Thorn 1:30-3:15, Room KC 203 LawWithoutWalls, Presenters Ray Campbell, Elizabeth Chambliss, John Flood, Tahlia Gordon, Bruce Green, Renee Newman Knake, Steve Mark, Deborah Rhode, Rob Rosen, Rita Shakel… [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 5:21 pm
As the court made clear in Terry v Person Unknown ([2010] EWHC 119 (QB)), any application for such derogation should be supported by evidence in an application. [read post]
