Search for: "English et al v. The United States et al"
Results 1 - 20
of 266
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Nov 2016, 12:55 pm
It’s a modified hold-over from English law, where the governing principle was simply “The king can do no wrong. [read post]
12 Dec 2007, 7:22 am
According to Heupel et. al. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2020, 1:56 am
CITGO Asphalt Refining Co. et al. v. [read post]
28 Feb 2015, 5:38 am
And they highlighted that we in the United States know almost nothing about the Tragedy and the apparently significant role of the United States as the post-World War II peacetime military force in South Korea with control over the Korean military and national police. [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 8:21 am
In Intellectual Ventures I LLC, et al. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2006, 5:49 am
United Kingdom, at paras. 46-49; repeated in Kalogeropoulou and Others v. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 8:29 am
Bolinger, et al v. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 6:51 pm
Carijano, et al. v. [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 9:16 am
In MF Global Holdings Ltd. et al. v. [read post]
16 Nov 2006, 4:10 pm
The Republic of Sudan suffered a default by doing so, but its Canadian corporate co-defendent won a valuable dismissal in the matter The Presbyterian Church of Sudan et al. v. [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 11:19 am
Keller on behalf of STATE OF TEXAS (Keller, Scott) (Entered: 11/28/2017)11/28/201711 MOTION for Leave to File Brief of Amici Curiae by STATE OF TEXAS, STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ARKANSAS, STATE OF GEORGIA, STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF OKLAHOMA, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Proposed Brief of Texas et al., # 2 Text of… [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 11:19 am
Keller on behalf of STATE OF TEXAS (Keller, Scott) (Entered: 11/28/2017)11/28/201711 MOTION for Leave to File Brief of Amici Curiae by STATE OF TEXAS, STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ARKANSAS, STATE OF GEORGIA, STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF OKLAHOMA, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Proposed Brief of Texas et al., # 2 Text of… [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 9:16 am
In MF Global Holdings Ltd. et al. v. [read post]
9 Sep 2006, 8:18 am
In the context of an action for the recognition of an English money judgment in the District of Columbia, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit confirmed the preclusive effect of the Act of State doctrine. [read post]
10 May 2016, 7:56 am
., et al. v TRW Lucas Varity Electric Steering Ltd., et al. [2016] EWCA Civ 396, considered the impact of similar clauses, in that case one which provided “Entire agreement; amendment: This Agreement, which includes the Appendices hereto, is the only agreement between the Parties relating to the subject matter hereof. [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 4:57 am
United Food & Commercial Workers Union, Local 1099 v. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 8:10 pm
Petitioner of the Cassation Challenge in the Case of Sara Grant Tobal, Josefina Escalante Romero et al. v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 10:34 am
Amara, et al., decided May 16, 2011 by the United States Supreme Court, a very important case changing the landscape of employee benefits litigation. [read post]
28 Apr 2007, 6:55 am
An unpublished opinion from from the United States District Court from the Northern District of Ohio called Jerman v Carlisle, McNellie et al at 2006 U S Dist LEXIS 85339 held that a debtor's demand for verification of the debt does not have to be in writing in order to be effective. [read post]
28 Apr 2007, 6:55 am
An unpublished opinion from from the United States District Court from the Northern District of Ohio called Jerman v Carlisle, McNellie et al at 2006 U S Dist LEXIS 85339 held that a debtor's demand for verification of the debt does not have to be in writing in order to be effective. [read post]
