Search for: "English v. Families First DE" Results 81 - 100 of 261
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jan 2012, 3:07 am by New Books Script
32 new acquisitions for the Osgoode Hall Law School Library, including 1 from 2012: Families count : profiling Canada’s families IV Ottawa : Vanier Institute of the Family = Institut Vanier de la famille, 2010 HQ 560 P76 2010 Families count : profiling Canada’s families IV Ottawa : Vanier Institute of the Family = Institut Vanier de la famille, 2010 xx, 186 p. : ill. ; 28 cm. … [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 6:19 am by Chukwuma Okoli
  This rule as applied in Nigeria  –  often referred to as the  Mocambique  rule  –  is derived from the English case of British South Africa Company v Companhia de Mocambique [1893] AC 602. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 8:00 pm by Jan von Hein
The latest issue of the “Praxis des Internationalen Privat- und Verfahrensrechts (IPRax)” features the following articles: F. [read post]
30 Aug 2021, 12:19 am by Jan von Hein
An English version of this text can be found at www.iprax.de/de/dokumente/online-veroeffentlichungen/   C. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 7:26 am
After Pfizer initiated legal proceedings, Roche de-designated the UK from all relevant patent families. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 6:00 am by Giesela Ruehl
  Anne Röthel, Family and Property in English Law: Developments and Explanations, pp. 131-160(30) Abstract: In continental jurisdictions, there is still a strong link between family and property. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 12:29 pm by Blog Editorial
The first case from the Bahamas, Maxo Tido v The Queen will be heard on Monday 7 March 2011 and concerns evidential and sentencing issues. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 4:43 pm by INFORRM
  Although we are in the English summer legal vacation there are still a number of media and law developments in this jurisdiction and abroad. [read post]
The Court of Appeal unanimously held that the result of the order was to render Pham de facto stateless but not de jure stateless and the Home Secretary’s appeal succeeded on the first ground and the second ground did not therefore arise. [read post]