Search for: "English v. People" Results 41 - 60 of 3,266
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Feb 2024, 1:16 am by Chukwuma Okoli
  Veena Srirangam,  “The governing law of contribution claims: looking beyond Roberts v SSAFA” The governing law of claims for contribution, where the applicable law of the underlying claim is a foreign law, has long posed a knotty problem in English private international law. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 4:22 pm by INFORRM
Since Mrs Justice Collins Rice handed down judgment in Fox v Blake [2024] EWHC 146 (KB) there has been a lot of online discussion about the case. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 10:40 am by Jeffrey Randa
That the petitioner has the ability and motivation to drive safely and within the law. v. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm by Josh Blackman
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] On January 18, Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar filed an amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 4:06 am by Rob Robinson
That same year, in Caratube v Kazakhstan, confidential information was leaked from the Kazakh government’s IT system and the claimant eventually obtained some of the leaked documents. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 11:32 am by Camilla Hrdy
  On trade secrecy and privacy issues implicated by people using large language models like ChatGPT, I found Dave Levine's essay and this HJOLT note by Amy Winograd really helpful. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 2:40 am by jonathanturley
Judge Wendy Beetlestone just denied a critical motion to dismiss in De Piero v. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 5:03 pm by Lundgren & Johnson, PSC
Jury Selection – Minnesota Trial Lawyer When people envision an American jury trial, the most common scenes that come to mind are most likely closing arguments and cross-examination. [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 3:59 am by Susanne Gössl
This was to prevent individuals of English descent, residing in colonial territories for long periods, from solely accessing English law while also enabling others to access this law. 2. [read post]