Search for: "Environmental Integrity Project v. Environmental Protection Agency"
Results 61 - 80
of 198
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Sep 2018, 7:10 am
One underused provision in the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) makes Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Superfund Special Accounts available for reimbursement to Bona Fide Prospective Purchasers (BFPPs). [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 2:30 pm
(Protect the Historic Amador Waterways v. [read post]
22 Mar 2020, 6:30 pm
King & Gardiner Farms, LLC v. [read post]
10 Jan 2014, 4:10 pm
While Davidon Homes v. [read post]
9 Feb 2020, 7:17 pm
Energy projects in Canada are of enormous public interest, with significant economic, social, and environmental affects. [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 9:37 am
Applying the deferential substantial evidence standard of review to the City’s factual determination that the project fell within the historical resource exemption (i.e., was consistent with the Secretary’s Standards) (citing Protect Tustin Ranch v. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 11:44 am
The STB also noted that the project is subject to environmental review under the federal National Environmental Protection Act (42 U.S.C. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 7:42 am
Environmental Protection Agency’s First Report on the Impact of Hydraulic Fracturing on Drinking Water Resources The U.S. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 11:17 am
Hart In California Native Plant Society v. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 10:35 am
On appeal, the appellate court first addressed the contradictory aspects of the CEQA full disclosure requirement with the obligation to protect the integrity of cultural resources by not disclosing specific information. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 7:17 pm
Environmental Protection Agency intended to consolidate preconstruction and Title V permitting requirements. [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 2:07 pm
After prompting by Judge Nakamura, the plaintiffs' counsel countered that argument, suggesting an overly broad reading of "use" could be limited by asking whether the activity (in this case the importation) was an "integral part of the project. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 8:30 am
Social science evidence confirms the determination of Congress that segregation is harmful and integration beneficial to educational achievement, access to employment, personal and environmental health, and other aspects of a fulfilling and stable life. [read post]
16 Nov 2023, 9:05 pm
The National Environmental Protection Act requires federal agencies to perform detailed studies into the environmental impacts of federal infrastructure projects before construction on the project may begin. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 5:48 pm
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held in State of Connecticut v. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 11:56 am
” (Citing Salmon Protection & Watershed Network v. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 3:24 pm
City of Monterey Park (2012) 210 Cal.App.4th 394 [voter-approved ballot measure was funding mechanism or fiscal activity, not commitment to specific project with potential environmental impacts]; Cedar Fair, L.P. v. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 4:54 pm
California Resources Agency (2002) 103 Cal.App.4th 98 (“CBE”), it would be helpful to add the following language from that case at its beginning: “[A] lead agency’s use of existing environmental standards in determining the significance of a project’s environmental effects is an effective means of promoting consistency in significance determinations and integrating CEQA’s environmental review… [read post]
15 Jun 2008, 7:39 pm
The Article performs a qualitative analysis of the potential benefits and costs of such laws and finds that, on balance, assured supply laws provide at least five significant benefits: consumer protection, greater holistic project- and agency-level planning, improved efficiencies in water rights allocation, and increased water conservation. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 9:00 am
Clean Harbors Environmental Services, 95-STA-34, D&O of ARB, at 7 (August 8, 1997), aff’d, Clean Harbors Environmental Services v. [read post]
