Search for: "Environmental Waste v. Agency for Toxic Substances"
Results 21 - 40
of 58
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jul 2013, 9:58 am
(A deposition taken by Defendants of a staffer at the Department of Toxic Substances Control indicated that DTSC was not concerned with enforcing the Clean Water Act.) [read post]
December 14, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
13 Dec 2009, 8:58 pm
December 14, 2009 – A summary review of environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
10 May 2010, 1:16 pm
In a statement released Tuesday, the Justice Department and Environmental Protection Agency say the company also will install five new pieces of waste water equipment. [read post]
November 30, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
30 Nov 2009, 9:25 am
Click Here California Appeals Court Affirms Lower Court Holding in Goodrich v. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 10:44 am
Click Here American Trucking Association et al. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2023, 1:27 pm
The US Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) released a PFAS Strategic Roadmap in 2021 detailing the Agency’s commitment to addressing PFAS in a whole-of-agency approach. [read post]
14 Feb 2023, 1:27 pm
Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) released a PFAS Strategic Roadmap in 2021 detailing the Agency’s commitment to addressing PFAS in a whole-of-agency approach. [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:30 pm
– Recycling Today, April 26, 2010 Agmet LLC has agreed to pay the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) more than $23,000 to settle past hazardous waste violations at its metal hydroxide recycling and metal oxide concentrate production facility in Oakwood Village, Ohio. [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 1:37 pm
PFAS and CERCLA – Cost Recovery Claims to Swell On August 26th, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) recommended designating perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) as “hazardous substances” covered under CERCLA, or the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 3:17 pm
Environmental Protection Agency Region 7 to settle a series of alleged violations of federal laws regarding the management of hazardous wastes at its freight facility in Lenexa, Kan. [read post]
December 29, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
29 Dec 2009, 5:50 pm
Click Here EPA settles with Clear Lam packaging on hazardous waste violations; penalty, environmental project ordered. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 7:16 pm
Prosecutors say the feedlot was ordered in 2005 to build something to control livestock waste and prevent the waste from reaching the Platte River. [read post]
December 21, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
21 Dec 2009, 10:57 am
— Imelda V. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 10:47 pm
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced today. [read post]
23 Apr 2021, 8:43 am
The Navy then began dumping toxic waste in a valley that became the Ordot Dump. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am
On July 9, 2010, Plaintiff United States of America (“United States”), on behalf of the United States Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) filed a complaint in this matter pursuant to CERCLA Section 107, 42 U.S.C. 9607, seeking recovery of environmental response costs incurred by EPA related to the release or threatened release or disposal of hazardous substances at or from the Site. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 11:15 am
Under EPCRA, companies must also report both routine and accidental releases of toxic chemicals, as well as the maximum amount of any listed chemicals at the facility and the amount contained in wastes transferred off-site. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 4:42 pm
— Imelda V. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 8:45 am
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced it will study the impacts of hydraulic fracturing on drinking water resources. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 8:43 am
But his administration’s decision on this case, Connecticut v. [read post]
