Search for: "Eric Segall" Results 201 - 220 of 360
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jan 2017, 7:44 am
Truthmakerless constitutional theories like those of Judge Posner, Eric Segall or the early Felix Frankfurter cannot vindicate “wrong the day it was decided” (WTDIWD) data from the Court itself, and irreducibly plural constitutional theories like those of Philip Bobbitt cannot vindicate such data in cases where constitutional modes conflict. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 5:44 am
by Eric Segall   About a month before Justice Scalia passed away last February, the Supreme Court voted to hear an important case raising fundamental questions about the separation (or not) of church and state. [read post]
13 Jan 2017, 6:11 am
Segal, Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, on Saturday, January 7, 2017 Tags: Boards of Directors, Compensation disclosure, Compensation guidelines, Compensation ratios, Compensation regulation, Director compensation, Dodd-Frank Act, Glass Lewis, ISS, Management, Proxy advisors, Say on frequency, Say on pay, Securities regulation, Taxation, Whistleblowers Sustainability Practices: 2016 Edition Posted by Matteo Tonello, The Conference Board, Inc., on Sunday, January 8, 2017 Tags:… [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 8:58 am
"Why Trump and the GOP Might not Want to Fill Scalia's Seat": Eric Segall has this post today at the "Dorf on Law" blog. [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 6:50 am by Jim Sedor
Indiana – State Senator Introduces Ethics Bill to Ban All Gifts from LobbyistsWTHR – Bob Segall | Published: 1/3/2017 Indiana Sen. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 4:41 am by Will Baude
In any event, we provoked a sur-reply, by Richard Posner and Eric Segall, called “Faux Originalism. [read post]
17 Dec 2016, 10:18 am
"SCOTUS Term Limits in the Next Congress": Eric Segall and Gabe Roth have this post today at "Dorf on Law. [read post]
17 Dec 2016, 5:00 am
By Eric Segall and Guest Blogger Gabe Roth, Executive Director of Fix the CourtNews that Ted Cruz is planning on introducing a constitutional amendment on congressional term limits next month has yet to stoke the interest or imagination of liberals and progressives. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 4:42 am by Jon Hyman
 — via Eric Meyer’s The Employer Handbook Blog Exemption Rules Appeal Won’t Be Resolved Before Obama Leaves Office — via Wage & Hour Insights Ignoring the minimum wage is a big deal! [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 4:42 am by Jon Hyman
 — via Eric Meyer’s The Employer Handbook Blog Exemption Rules Appeal Won’t Be Resolved Before Obama Leaves Office — via Wage & Hour Insights Ignoring the minimum wage is a big deal! [read post]
24 Nov 2016, 4:00 am
By Eric SegallThanksgiving 2016 is not Thanksgiving as usual for my family or my country. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 3:49 am by Edith Roberts
” At Dorf on Law, Eric Segall maintains that the conventional wisdom that Thomas is a pure originalist is a “myth,” arguing that “Thomas consistently reaches conservative results regardless of whether those results can be justified by reference to the actual words of the Constitution or their original meaning. [read post]
16 Oct 2016, 11:14 am
"Divided Government is Great so Why not for SCOTUS": Eric Segall has this post today at "Dorf on Law. [read post]
16 Oct 2016, 7:16 am
By Eric SegallI am excited to be giving a talk tomorrow at Indiana University on my proposal that the Senate do what it can to make permanent our current eight person evenly divided Supreme Court. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 4:33 am by Edith Roberts
” In The Conversation, Eric Segall takes issue with the tendency of “most court watchers” to deplore the current eight-member Supreme Court as “an incomplete, divided legal institution,” arguing that “the longer we have an evenly divided court, the more likely it will be the justices will act more modestly, and take more heed of Hamilton’s warning that they exercise ‘judgment’ not ‘will. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 8:02 am by Alfred Brophy
Sanders (University of Idaho College of Law); Eric J. [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 5:42 am by Edith Roberts
Eric Segall contends in The Daily Beast that, contrary to much recent hand-wringing by “legal pundits and academic Court watchers” about the ills of an evenly divided eight-member Court, “there are many advantages to such a Court, and we might all be better off if both political parties in the Senate made a commitment to keep this balance permanent. [read post]