Search for: "Erik Hovenkamp" Results 21 - 40 of 63
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Mar 2019, 8:45 am by D Daniel Sokol
Cotter, University of Minnesota Law School, Erik Hovenkamp, Harvard Law School; Yale Law School, and Norman Siebrasse, University of New Brunswick - Fredericton - Faculty of Law are Demystifying Patent Holdup. [read post]
5 Mar 2019, 8:55 am by Michael Risch
The "classic" holdup story in the economics literature relates to incomplete contracts or other partial relationships that allow one party to take advantage of an investment by the other to extract rents.You can see the overlap, but the "classic" folks think that patent holdup story doesn't count, because there's no prior negotiation - the party investing has the opportunity to research patents, negotiate beforehand, plan their affairs, etc.In their new article… [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 6:00 am by Juvan Bonni
Holbrook: Extraterritoriality and Proximate Cause after WesternGeco (Source: SSRN) Erik Hovenkamp and Prof. [read post]
19 Aug 2018, 2:39 pm by Juvan Bonni
Recent Headlines in the IP World: Paul Fucito: USPTO Announces 2018 Patents for Humanity Winners (Source: USPTO) Alexander Stoklosa: Ferrari Patents Novel Method for Making Turbocharged Engines Sound Better (Source: Car and Driver) Jan Wolfe: Federal Circuit Tosses Wireless Patent Infringement Finding Against Apple (Source: Reuters) Danielle Kirsh: Syneo Receives Patent in China (Source: Medical Design and Outsourcing) David Phelan: Hey, Siri, It’s Me: Apple Patent Teases… [read post]
8 May 2018, 5:00 am by D Daniel Sokol
Cotter, University of Minnesota Law School, Erik Hovenkamp, Harvard Law School; Yale Law School, and Norman Siebrasse, University of New Brunswick - Fredericton - Faculty of Law describe Switching Costs, Path Dependence, and Patent Holdup. [read post]
3 Mar 2018, 5:57 pm by Lisa Ouellette
@ThomasCotter1, Erik Hovenkamp, Norm Siebrasse: Tech switching only leads to patent holdup when, due to path dependence, commitment to tech effects irreversible change in prospective costs or benefits of alternative. [read post]
3 Mar 2018, 5:57 pm by Lisa Ouellette
@ThomasCotter1, Erik Hovenkamp, Norm Siebrasse: Tech switching only leads to patent holdup when, due to path dependence, commitment to tech effects irreversible change in prospective costs or benefits of alternative. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 5:00 am by D Daniel Sokol
Erik Hovenkamp, Harvard Law School and Jorge Lemus, University Of Illinois Urbana Champaign identify Proportional Restraints and the Patent System. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 12:00 am by D Daniel Sokol
Erik Hovenkamp, Harvard Law analyzes Tying, Exclusivity, and Standard-Essential Patents. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 10:53 am by Dennis Crouch
In his recent article, Antitrust Economist (and lawyer) Erik Hovenkamp argues that the “right to challenge a patent” should also be an important consideration in antitrust analysis. [read post]
13 Nov 2016, 5:00 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Hovenkamp, Erik, Challenge Restraints and the Scope of the Patent (November 8, 2016). [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 12:00 am by D Daniel Sokol
Erik Hovenkamp, Northwestern University, Department of Economics and Jorge Lemus, University Of Illinois Urbana Champaign theorize about Pay for Go-Away: Reverse Payment Settlements and Holdup Under PTAB. [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 9:40 am by Lisa Ouellette
Erik Hovenkamp: Argument is related to strategic delegation literature, which was criticized based on failure to account for renegotiation. [read post]