Search for: "Ernst v. Ernst" Results 1 - 20 of 582
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Dec 2007, 5:30 am
This recently published report from Ernst & Young offers financial statement preparers, users, and auditors â€â [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 10:06 am
Biffa Waste Services Ltd and Another v Maschinenfabrik Ernst Hese GmbH and Another Court of Appeal “The principle which made an employer liable for the negligence of a subcontractor engaged to carry out extra-hazardous or dangerous operations was unsaisfactory and should be applied as narrowly as possible. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 9:53 am
Biffa Waste Services Ltd and another v Maschinenfabrik Ernst Hese GmbH and others [2008] EWCA Civ 1238; [2008] WLR (D) 353 “The principle that a person who employed an independent contractor would be liable for the negligence of that independent contractor where the independent contractor was engaged to carry out extra-hazardous or dangerous operations was binding on the Court of Appeal but its application should be kept as narrow as possible. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 8:36 pm
In 2012, two former employees filed a class and collective action lawsuit against Ernst & Young in the [...] [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 2:24 pm by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
The reverse doctrine of equivalents was established by the Supreme Court in the 1898 case Boyden Power-Brake v. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 3:01 pm by Erik Gerding
It is hard to say anything detailed about a suit that has not been filed yet, but this type of suit could have even broader implications that this summer's SEC v. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 8:12 am by propertyprof
Ernst (Georgetown) has a fantastic summary of the recent scholarship on the history of Pierson v. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 10:15 am by Alfred Brophy
Seeing Dan Ernst's note at legal history blog about Victoria Nourse's article, "Buck v. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 3:22 am
The determination was sustained on appeal from the Board’s subsequent decision [Ernst v Saratoga County, 251 AD2d 866]. [read post]
11 May 2018, 6:14 pm by Thomas O. Gorman
It has also been a key element in private damage actions based on the cause of action implied under Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5 since Ernst & Ernst v. [read post]