Search for: "Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue" Results 81 - 100 of 146
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 May 2020, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Supreme Court, which heard arguments on the merits in January in the case, Espinoza v. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 6:22 am by John Elwood
Montana Department of Revenue, which raises another free exercise question. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 3:40 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed for The New York Times, Sarah Vowell weighs in on Espinoza v. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 3:45 am by Edith Roberts
Montana Department of Revenue that states “cannot exclude religious schools from participating on an equal basis in school choice programs” would “advance[] a classical liberal political economy. [read post]
13 Feb 2020, 5:48 am by Howard Bashman
Montana Department of Revenue, a potentially monumental case concerning the Free Exercise Clause. [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 8:32 am by Kalvis Golde
” At the Harvard Law Review Blog, Aaron Tang suggests that there is an issue lurking in Espinoza v. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 7:47 am by Kalvis Golde
At Law360 (registration required), Daniel Dalton argues that, should the justices decide Espinoza v. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 7:13 am by Kalvis Golde
Montana Department of Revenue. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 7:39 am by Kalvis Golde
Montana Department of Revenue, the religious-school-funding dispute argued last month. [read post]
1 Feb 2020, 3:36 am
Montana’s Original Sin By Garrett Epps, Professor of Law, University of Baltimore Garrett Epps writes about Espinoza v. [read post]
31 Jan 2020, 3:36 am by Edith Roberts
At The Atlantic, Garrett Epps looks at the story behind a state constitutional provision relied on by Montana in Espinoza v. [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 3:49 am by Edith Roberts
Montana Department of Revenue “not only that a state may include religious schools in a voucher program, but that it must include them, if it wants to have a voucher program at all. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 3:58 am by Edith Roberts
Montana Department of Revenue] is an indication, the ruling this spring may hinge on the dangerous fallacy that separation of church and state is hostility toward religion akin to overt racial discrimination. [read post]
25 Jan 2020, 1:14 pm by Ilya Somin
Montana Department of Revenue, a constitutional challenge to Montana's state constitutional Blaine Amendment, which forbids the use of public funds to pay for instruction at any religious school. [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 11:45 am by Oyez Project
Montana Department of Revenue The post Now available on Oyez: This week’s oral argument audio aligned with the transcripts appeared first on SCOTUSblog. [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 3:49 am by Edith Roberts
Montana Department of Revenue, which asks whether Montana’s invalidation of a law that created tax credits to provide scholarships for families who send their children to private schools, including religious schools, was constitutional. [read post]