Search for: "Esprit Corp. v. U.s"
Results 1 - 16
of 16
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Oct 2008, 11:05 am
Esprit de corps through uniformity of appearance.Valdes had requested an exemption from this policy to comply with his religious obligations as a Muslim. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 8:37 am
U.S. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 2:13 pm
Board of River Boat Pilots Com’rs for the Port of New Orleans 330 U.S. 552 (1947). [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 1:20 pm
Dynamics Corp. of Am., 975 F.2d 815, 826 (Fed. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 2:15 am
And those interest would include: Production concerns; Using a uniform requirement to promote an esprit de corps; and Promoting discipline and uniformity. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 3:49 pm
Moreover, [Francis v. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 4:02 am
About six million VéloSolex were produced, and they were loved for their simplicity and that certain "esprit de France" - baguette, Brigitte Bardot, lazy morning in the sun, anyone? [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 9:16 am
U.S. v. [read post]
7 Jul 2016, 8:44 am
Corp. v. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 7:06 am
Verrilli continued, "serves a compelling interest in protecting the integrity of the military honors program, thereby preserving the medals' ability to foster morale and esprit de corps in the military. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 7:06 am
Verrilli continued, "serves a compelling interest in protecting the integrity of the military honors program, thereby preserving the medals' ability to foster morale and esprit de corps in the military. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 9:02 pm
Arguing for the federal government will be U.S. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 12:00 pm
By contrast, here are things recognized as compelling interests in U.S. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 10:32 am
State Bd. of Educ. v. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 10:44 am
The Stolen Valor case, United States v. [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 2:00 am
CUSTOMS logo barred by sections 2(a) and 2(b): In re Peter S Herrick, PA (TTABlog) TTAB enters judgment on the pleadings against applicant who admitted non-use of its mark Esprit IP Limited v Mellbeck Ltd (not precedential) (TTABlog) WYHA? [read post]
