Search for: "Estate of Cochran" Results 81 - 87 of 87
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 May 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Federal Watchdog to Examine Official’s Role in Tribal Fund Distribution New York Times – Emily Cochrane and Mark Walker | Published: 5/11/2020 A federal watchdog is investigating whether a top Interior Department official – Tara Sweeney, the assistant secretary for Indian Affairs – violated ethics rules when she helped decide how a critical portion of funds for Native American tribes in the $2.2 trillion stimulus law should be distributed. [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Democratic Plan to Subpoena Supreme Court Justices’ Allies Faces Pushback MSN – Ann Marimow (Washington Post) | Published: 11/8/2023 Democrats in Congress have tried unsuccessfully to press the Supreme Court to strengthen its ethics rules following revelations that some justices accepted and did not report free luxury travel, real estate deals, and gifts from wealthy benefactors. [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 11:00 pm
Cochran to Essence Communications Partners, HBO and Time Warner. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Special Counsel Questioned Witnesses About 2 Rooms FBI Didn’t Search Inside Trump’s Mar-a-Lago Residence: Sources Yahoo News – Katherine Faulders, Mike Levine, and Alexander Mallin (ABC News) | Published: 2/1/2024 Special counsel Jack Smith’s team has questioned several witnesses about a closet and a “hidden room” inside Donald Trump’s residence at Mar-a-Lago that the FBI did not check while searching the estate in August 2022, sources… [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
House Democrats Retreat on Remote Voting as Republicans Clamor to Reopen New York Times – Catie Edmonson and Emily Cochrane | Published: 4/22/2020 Democratic leaders backed away from a plan to change the rules of the U.S. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 1:32 pm by Joel R. Brandes
The court awarded the plaintiff the two properties upon considering a number of factors, including that the real estate was acquired during the marriage; the defendant=s income increased substantially during the marriage, while the plaintiff delayed her own career advancement and remained at home caring for the parties= four children; the businesses, which were marital property and would have been subject to equitable d [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 1:32 pm by Joel R. Brandes
The court awarded the plaintiff the two properties upon considering a number of factors, including that the real estate was acquired during the marriage; the defendant=s income increased substantially during the marriage, while the plaintiff delayed her own career advancement and remained at home caring for the parties= four children; the businesses, which were marital property and would have been subject to equitable d [read post]