Search for: "Estate of Dupont" Results 81 - 100 of 115
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 May 2009, 1:29 pm
Texas lawyer Andrew Schirrmeister responded to a motion for sanctions by former appellate judge Gordon Maag, admitting that his application to practice in an Illinois benzene suit without an Illinois license omitted information about prior sanctions - due to the fault of the paralegal that prepared it.Gordon Maag represents the plaintiff, The Estate of Kent Herzog, in a civil action against DuPont for alleged negligent exposure to benzene. [read post]
10 May 2009, 12:03 pm
• Dupont announced that it would eliminate 2,000 more jobs. [read post]
10 Apr 2009, 8:44 am
Corporations hit by the recession are adopting a model used by DuPont Co., which are pressing firms for fixed fees or 10 to 25 percent discounts, accordingto Bloomberg.com. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 11:42 am
  The husband passed away and the parties’ daughter asked the husband’s employer to pay the benefits to the husband’s estate. [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 5:08 pm
  His estate requested that the funds be distributed to them but the Plan administrator, relying on Mr. [read post]
28 Jan 2009, 8:13 am
William Kennedy divorced Liv Kennedy and in the divorce settlement, Liv wived any right to receive payment from the DuPont plan. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 8:24 am
She sent a letter to DuPont requesting the Estate be paid the funds in the SIP. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 12:41 pm
  Ultimately, the estate lost in the Fifth Circuit Court. [read post]
12 Jan 2009, 5:43 am
Among them were: DuPont, which invented neoprene (synthetic rubber) in 1931 and nylon in 1934; Polaroid; Hewlett Packard; and RCA, which turned its research from radio to the new market, television, returning to profitability in 1934. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 11:00 pm
DuPont Savings Plan Administrator (07-636) that the Court had originally not agreed to hear — that is, the role of plan documents in interpreting rights to benefits. [read post]