Search for: "Estate of Farrell v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 78
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 May 2014, 10:41 am
The court in White v. [read post]
28 Jan 2022, 3:59 am
Although the complaint alleges that Devine and Neiman induced Allen to lend money beginning in 2000, the continuing wrong doctrine (see Selkirk v State of New York, 249 AD2d 818, 819; Barash v Estate of Sperlin, 271 AD2d 558) applies such that the six-year statute of limitations “began to run from the commission of the last wrongful act” (Community Network Serv., Inc. v Verizon NY, Inc., 39 AD3d 300, 301). [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 7:30 pm
Counsel states that because of the beneficiary's behavior, her firm performed services that far exceeded those typically required in estate administration. [read post]
13 May 2019, 4:12 am
Co. v Farrell, 57 AD3d 721 [2d Dept 2008]). [read post]
23 May 2016, 7:51 am
The New York State Attorney General appeared in the now-contested probate proceeding to represent the charitable interests under the will. [read post]
23 May 2016, 7:51 am
The New York State Attorney General appeared in the now-contested probate proceeding to represent the charitable interests under the will. [read post]
8 Nov 2007, 12:10 pm
State of Indiana (NFP) Farrell Henderson v. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 3:00 am
Subsequent Case Law: In Litke O’Farrell, LLC v. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 6:04 am
For example the Appellate Division has held that the fact that a decedent registered to vote in a particular state does not mean that the decedent made that state his or her domicile (see Laufer v Hauge, 140 AD2d 671 [2d Dept 1988]; Matter of Estate of Gadway, 133 AD2d 83 [3d Dept 1987]). [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 3:15 am
” State v. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 3:00 am
Subsequent Case Law: In Litke O’Farrell, LLC v. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 3:00 am
Subsequent Case Law: In Litke O’Farrell, LLC v. [read post]
20 Aug 2021, 10:04 am
” Hanson v. [read post]
22 May 2024, 4:03 am
Zaccaro, Co., Inc. v DHA Capital, LLC, 157 AD3d 602, 602 [1st Dept 2018], lv denied 31 NY3d 907 [2018]; see also Jerome Prince, Richard on Evidence § 8-215 [Farrell 11th ed 1995]). [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 3:00 am
Grant v. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 3:32 am
(The rules are different in states that have enacted the Revised Uniform Partnership Act.) [read post]
2 May 2011, 4:00 am
Referee Crespo also bases his rejection of DLOM on case law, including Vick v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 4:35 pm
Mahler of Farrell Fritz in his New York Business Divorce Blog Marvel Wins Copyright Fight with Jack Kirby's Heirs - Toronto attorney Megan Connolly of Connolly Law on her blog, Toronto Estates & Trusts Monitor Marriage and Divorce: Is it Time for Separation of Church and State? [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 4:11 pm
- Legal marketing expert Lindsay Griffiths of International Lawyers Network on Zen & The Art of Legal Networking The Voices of Moderation Strike Again - Patrick Maines, president of The Media Institute, at the Institute's Media & Communications Policy Blog The Best Real Estate Advice a Small Business Will Ever Receive - Cleveland lawyer John Weber of Ullmer Berne on the firm's Real Estate Advisor Law Blog Canton v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 7:56 am
Co. v Farrell, 57 AD3d 721 [2008]; Delphi Restoration Corp. v Sunshine Restoration Corp., 43 AD3d 851 [2007]; Schulman v Indian Harbor Ins. [read post]
