Search for: "Estate of Faulkner" Results 61 - 73 of 73
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jul 2010, 12:06 pm by Carter Ruml
On the estate tax front, it’s been a Macbeth/Faulkner fortnight in Congress – full of sound and fury, signifying nothing. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 5:39 am by pete.black@gmail.com (Peter Black)
"John Faulkner To Move To The Back Bench" http://j.mp/cdncrY am i the only one looking forward to this? [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 4:55 am by Lawrence Solum
Plecnik; JD 2006 Duke University; LLM 2009 New York University Taxation; United States Tax Court; Tax Law Columbia University Abbe Gluck; JD 2000 Yale University; Academic Fellow Columbia University; United States Supreme Court; Legislation Faulkner University Layne Keele; JD 2005 Indiana University; ; United States Court of Appeals; Florida International University Noah Weisbord; LLB 2003 McGill University; LLM 2004 Harvard University, SJD 2010 Harvard University; Visiting Assistant… [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 2:59 am
  For example, we currently require real estate developers to build sidewalks and install streetlamps as a condition of approving their construction of a subdivision. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 8:38 am
Both Shelley Saxer (Pepperdine Law) and my colleague at Faulkner, Adam MacLeod, have recently posted working papers on RLUIPA. [read post]
1 Sep 2009, 10:52 am by velvel
He is a brilliant guy who, despite his brilliance, seems never to have learned the truth in Faulkner’s line that the past is not prologue; it is not even past. [read post]
9 May 2009, 5:02 pm
Like the Faulkner board itself, the Cassman court found Faulkner irrelevant for income tax purposes, as Faulkner was based almost entirely on an analysis of how trust and estate law treated unborn children. [read post]
11 Apr 2008, 9:00 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
28 Aug 2006, 1:16 pm
There, owners of valuable commercial real estate in the District of Columbia sought to avoid paying taxes on income generated by those properties. [read post]