Search for: "Estate of Heggstad (1993)" Results 1 - 12 of 12
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Feb 2023, 9:00 am by Underwood Law Firm, P.C.
  Continue reading → The post What is a Heggstad petition (Estate of Heggstad (1993) 16 Cal.App.4th 943)? [read post]
31 Jan 2018, 4:28 pm by admin
-John The post Heggstad for non-California assets part deux appeared first on Probate Sacramento CA | Trusted Probate and Estate Attorney. [read post]
31 Jan 2018, 4:28 pm by admin
-John The post Heggstad for non-California assets part deux appeared first on Probate Sacramento CA | Trusted Probate and Estate Attorney. [read post]
31 Jan 2018, 4:28 pm by admin
-John The post Heggstad for non-California assets part deux appeared first on Probate Sacramento CA | Trusted Probate and Estate Attorney. [read post]
31 Jan 2018, 4:28 pm by John Palley
  In other words, a Heggstad petition should only be granted in NV when there is not a creditor issue which would then not allow the creditor to make a claim to the property through the Estate proceeding. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 2:31 pm by Shahram Miri
In Estate of Heggstad (1993) 16 CA4th 943, the trust drafter failed to formally transfer his home into his revocable trust but his revocable trust included a declaration of trust in which it listed his home as an asset of the trust. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 6:27 pm by John Palley
(a)(3)(B); see also Estate of Heggstad (1993) 16 Cal.App.4th 943 [20 Cal.Rptr.2d 433].)[1] The shares had been owned by the deceased trustor, Mona S. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 6:27 pm by John Palley
(a)(3)(B); see also Estate of Heggstad (1993) 16 Cal.App.4th 943 [20 Cal.Rptr.2d 433].)[1] The shares had been owned by the deceased trustor, Mona S. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 10:15 pm by Roy M. Doppelt
There is an action called a Heggstad petition, named after a 1993 case entitled Estate of Heggstad. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 4:27 am
Filing with the court a Heggstad Petition (named after a 1993 California case Estate of Heggstad, 16 CA4th 943, 20 CR2d 433), a successor trustee may claim that property was intended to be owned by the trust simply because it was listed on the schedule of assets intended to be a part of the trust. [read post]