Search for: "Estate of Isaacson v. Isaacson"
Results 1 - 5
of 5
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Nov 2020, 4:00 am
Rosado, Sebrow v Sebrow, 2020 NY Slip Op 20269 [Sup Ct, Bronx County Oct. 9, 2020], is a stark reminder to corporate shareholders, attorneys who plan their estates, and their prospective beneficiaries, to exercise due diligence before attempting to make, draft, or receive testamentary dispositions of corporate stock. [read post]
29 May 2020, 9:14 am
” Isaacson v. [read post]
3 May 2017, 4:51 am
Laroe Estates, Inc. [read post]
20 Nov 2016, 6:00 am
Others get web design gigs, real estate sales jobs or a key to the C-suite. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 4:47 am
Sebrow v Sebrow (69 Misc 3d 1064 [Sup Ct, Bronx County 2020]), stands for the proposition, expressed by other courts in cases like Matter of Gusman (178 AD2d 597 [2d Dept 1991]), and Isaacson v Beau Label Corp., (93 AD2d 880 [2d Dept 1983]), that written transfer restrictions or buy-sell agreements governing closely-held business interests will trump, and potentially defeat, conflicting testamentary bequests. [read post]
