Search for: "Estate of Miner"
Results 101 - 120
of 769
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Sep 2021, 6:15 am
This includes: life estates, remainderman interests, interests in mineral rights, and partial interests in real estate. [read post]
2 Sep 2021, 5:35 am
Percentage Depletion for Hard Mineral Fossil Fuels $1.311 billion The tax code has a similar provision for recovering the cost of acquiring coal reserves. [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 5:01 am
That’s why real estate sellers issue Forms 1099-S reporting sales and exchanges of real estate. [read post]
3 Aug 2021, 3:45 am
[No]"METRO LIVING & Design" Not Descriptive of Real Estate Brokerage Services, Says TTABReversing a 2(e)(2) Geographical Descriptiveness Refusal, TTAB Asks, Where The Heck Is WINDHOEK? [read post]
26 Jul 2021, 4:39 am
A mineral estate lessee (Swift) alleged that H2S (“brimstone” if you follow the Old Testament) injected into the Wilcox formation by an injection well (owned by Regency) migrated and injured its interests in the minerals underlying nearby properties. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 4:56 am
When the Meriwether lease terminated, the mineral estate reverted to the Trust. [read post]
29 Jun 2021, 1:03 pm
Prior to the development of the accommodation doctrine, it was thought—perhaps inappropriately—that the mineral estate was superior to the surface estate and had carried with it the unfettered right to use the surface. [read post]
29 Jun 2021, 1:03 pm
Prior to the development of the accommodation doctrine, it was thought—perhaps inappropriately—that the mineral estate was superior to the surface estate and had carried with it the unfettered right to use the surface. [read post]
29 Jun 2021, 1:03 pm
Prior to the development of the accommodation doctrine, it was thought—perhaps inappropriately—that the mineral estate was superior to the surface estate and had carried with it the unfettered right to use the surface. [read post]
29 Jun 2021, 1:03 pm
Prior to the development of the accommodation doctrine, it was thought—perhaps inappropriately—that the mineral estate was superior to the surface estate and had carried with it the unfettered right to use the surface. [read post]
16 Jun 2021, 4:43 am
Despite references to the mineral estate, the property description included the surface estate only. [read post]
2 Jun 2021, 6:29 am
The dispute 2005: Broadway Bank, Trustee, conveys mineral interests in DeWitt and Gonzales Counties to John in fee simple. 2006: the Bank executes a correction mineral deed attempting to change the fee mineral interest to a life estate. [read post]
4 May 2021, 4:22 am
More facts The Boundary Stipulation of Ownership of Mineral Interests between the owners of the Northwest Tract and Southeast Tract mineral estates declared the boundary of the mineral estate to be different from the public road and was recorded in the Irion County public records. [read post]
3 May 2021, 8:43 am
In 2008, Samson’s landman prepared a Boundary Stipulation of Ownership of Mineral Interest between the Farmars (owners of the southeast-tract mineral estate) and the Richeys (owners of the northwest-tract mineral estate). [read post]
3 May 2021, 8:43 am
In 2008, Samson’s landman prepared a Boundary Stipulation of Ownership of Mineral Interest between the Farmars (owners of the southeast-tract mineral estate) and the Richeys (owners of the northwest-tract mineral estate). [read post]
16 Apr 2021, 2:16 pm
As is common in Texas, one party owns the mineral estate, and another owns the surface estate. [read post]
3 Mar 2021, 4:05 am
Davis applied the doctrine to establish the quantum of the ownership in the mineral estate. [read post]
5 Feb 2021, 9:42 am
For their schemes, Ben Wootton and Race Miner, the owners of Keystone Biofuels Inc. [read post]
26 Jan 2021, 6:32 am
The result On appeal, the El Paso Court of Appeals affirmed and held that unless and until the mineral owners attempted to develop the mineral estate, usage of the surface estate was uninhibited by the accommodation doctrine. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 4:59 am
First appeal The Superior Court, in reversing a trial court summary judgment in favor of Southwestern, held that “hydraulic fracturing may constitute an actionable trespass where subsurface fractures, fracturing fluid and proppant cross boundary lines and extend into the subsurface estate of an adjoining property for which the operator does not have a mineral lease, resulting in the extraction of natural gas from beneath the adjoining landowner’s property. [read post]
