Search for: "Esty v. State" Results 21 - 40 of 42
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Dec 2020, 3:59 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Co. v Rosenberg & Estis, 192 AD2d 451 [1st Dept 1993], lv denied 82 NY2d 654 [1993]). [read post]
6 May 2009, 1:33 am
Estis, a founding partner at Rosenberg & Estis, and Jeffrey Turkel, a partner at the firm, review the recent First Department case of Hirsch v. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 2:04 am
Estis, a founding partner at Rosenberg & Estis, and Jeffrey Turkel, a partner at the firm, write that with its Oct. 22, 2009 decision in Roberts v. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 1:56 pm by Katherine Pompilio
Esti Tambay and Sarah Yager argue that amid bipartisan support of the proposed Justice for Victims of War Crimes Act—which would give the United States the ability to prosecute suspected war criminals discovered within U.S. borders regardless of nationality—Congress must work to close other loopholes to promote justice for international crimes. [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 2:33 pm by Liskow & Lewis
The stage appears to be set for intervention by the United States Supreme Court following the Ninth Circuit’s recent panel decision in Batterton v. [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 2:33 pm by Patrick Reagin
The stage appears to be set for intervention by the United States Supreme Court following the Ninth Circuit’s recent panel decision in Batterton v. [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 2:33 pm by Liskow & Lewis
The stage appears to be set for intervention by the United States Supreme Court following the Ninth Circuit’s recent panel decision in Batterton v. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 2:32 pm by Hyemin Han
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit in NetChoice v. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 8:44 am by Lyle Denniston
Esty). ** Whether a sender of commercial fax messages that is sued for damages under a federal law can defend itself by arguing in court that the federal law is invalid (Walburg v. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 4:35 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The Fifth Circuit’s October 21, 2015 opinion in Martin Resource Management Corporation v. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 6:42 am by Matthew Scarola
” Finally, David Kopel argues in the Washington Times that Justice Sotomayor’s recent dissent in McDonald v. [read post]