Search for: "Evans v. Falls"
Results 141 - 160
of 441
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2015, 9:30 am
The case, Obergefell v. [read post]
6 Jan 2009, 6:30 am
Evans, No. 95-335 (Charlottesville 1996)(insurer's statements); Billups v. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 3:30 am
Miller v. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 10:51 am
Evans, et al. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2008, 11:21 am
Evans. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 5:55 pm
Evans, 514 U.S. at 14. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 9:21 am
The transcript in Ocasio v. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 4:08 pm
I would like to sincerely thank my barrister Catrin Evans QC and my solicitors, Brett Wilson LLP. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 9:01 pm
While the CCRB had a prior practice of referring such matters to the Police Department's Internal Affairs Bureau, that prior practice does not render the CCRB's current interpretation arbitrary, especially where the CCRB has set forth a rational basis for changing its approach (see Matter of Juarez v New York State Off. of Victim [*3]Servs., 36 NY3d 485,496 [2021]; Matter of Mount Bldrs., LLC v Perlmutter, 200 AD3d 616, 616 [1st Dept 2021] lv denied 38 NY3d 906 [2022];… [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 9:01 pm
While the CCRB had a prior practice of referring such matters to the Police Department's Internal Affairs Bureau, that prior practice does not render the CCRB's current interpretation arbitrary, especially where the CCRB has set forth a rational basis for changing its approach (see Matter of Juarez v New York State Off. of Victim [*3]Servs., 36 NY3d 485,496 [2021]; Matter of Mount Bldrs., LLC v Perlmutter, 200 AD3d 616, 616 [1st Dept 2021] lv denied 38 NY3d 906 [2022];… [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 6:52 am
Even so, as Hedigan J held in Evans v Carlyle [2008] 2 ILRM 359, [2008] IEHC 143 (08 May 2008): The clear implication is that there may be cases where the court should act. [read post]
28 Feb 2008, 4:30 am
Stine v. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 7:14 am
Evans v. [read post]
2 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm
And if he is subpoenaed to testify before Congress, a strong argument can be made that he can, and should, say more.A 2000 DOJ Opinion, on which I worked while I was a deputy in the Office of Legal Counsel, reaffirmed a Watergate-era DOJ determination that criminally prosecuting a sitting President would violate the constitutional principle of separation of powers, even after the Supreme Court decided in Clinton v. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 12:15 pm
Evans Prods. [read post]
27 Nov 2018, 4:01 am
Sarah Evans and Kathryn Adamson preview the case for Cornell. [read post]
30 Oct 2014, 9:51 am
Evans, No. 09–cv–02045–REB–CBS, 2010 WL 3730382 (D. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 6:32 am
Evans v. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 7:02 am
Evan Stein (“Dr. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 1:41 am
Evans has his own concerns, arguing that the proposed amendment would be "dangerous and destructive to American business. [read post]
