Search for: "Ex Parte Anderson" Results 1 - 20 of 322
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
History Shows the Supreme Court Knows How to Move Quickly, as it Should With the Trump Immunity Case
22 Apr 2024, 5:50 am by Fred Wertheimer
(Justice William Rehnquist did not take part in the consideration or decision.) [read post]
Just Security - https://www.justsecurity.org/
Linke v. Freed: Weighing In On Public Official’s Social Media Sites
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am by Bernard Bell
  The key to navigating this distinction is not “whether making official announcements could fit within the job description; but whether making official announcements is actually part of the job that the State entrusted the official to do. [read post]
Notice & Comment - https://www.yalejreg.com/nc/
News You Can Use Digest – April 19, 2024
19 Apr 2024, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal Ex-Congressman Asks 11th Circuit to Toss Six-Figure Campaign Finance Penalty Courthouse News Service – Kayla Gogging | Published: 4/16/2024 Former U.S. [read post]
Lobby Comply Blog - https://stateandfed.com/lobbycomply/feed
What's dividing the Justices (and other initial reactions to the Court's decision in Trump v. Anderson)
5 Mar 2024, 8:13 am by Marty Lederman
Anderson. [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
Nine Justices in Search of an Excuse to Nullify Section 3 of the 14th Amendment
5 Mar 2024, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
Anderson. [read post]
Dorf on Law - http://www.dorfonlaw.org/
Trump v. Anderson, 601 U. S. ____ (2024): Text of Slip Opinion
4 Mar 2024, 12:47 pm
Anderson (No. 23–719). 601 U.S. --- (2024). [read post]
Law at the End of the Day - https://lcbackerblog.blogspot.com/
[Josh Blackman] A Response to Professor John Mikhail on "Officers of the United States"—Part II
22 Feb 2024, 2:04 pm by Josh Blackman
Part I can be found here. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
A Reality Check on "Officers of the United States" at the Founding
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am by John Mikhail
Anderson. [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
News You Can Use Digest – February 16, 2024
16 Feb 2024, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal Chief Witness Against Gaetz Is Cooperating with House Ethics Investigation DNyuz – Robert Draper and Michael Schmidt (New York Times) | Published: 2/9/2024 A lawyer for the chief witness against U.S. [read post]
Lobby Comply Blog - https://stateandfed.com/lobbycomply/feed
A User’s Guide to Trump v. Anderson, Addendum II: The Justices’ Principal Concern at Oral Argument, and the Possibility of a Federalism-Based Resolution
15 Feb 2024, 3:33 pm by Marty Lederman
Anderson was the extent to which the Justices coalesced around a single, shared federalism concern that wasn’t a prominent topic in the many briefs filed with the Court. [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
[Josh Blackman] Oral Arguments in Trump v. Anderson Part III: Justice Kavanaugh Gets Griffin's Case  and Justice Barrett gets FedCourts
9 Feb 2024, 1:28 pm by Josh Blackman
Anderson. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
[Ilya Somin] Thoughts on the Supreme Court Oral Argument in the Trump Section 3 Case
8 Feb 2024, 1:47 pm by Ilya Somin
For reasons explained in Part I.B of my amicus brief, that simply isn't true. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
A User’s Guide to Trump v. Anderson, Part Eight: The First Amendment/Right to Vote/Federalism-Based "Off-Ramp" Argument that is Likely to Carry the Day
8 Feb 2024, 9:44 am by Marty Lederman
Wisconsin ex rel. [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
[Eugene Volokh] "Seven Questions on Section 3: A Response to Professor Kurt Lash"
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am by Eugene Volokh
Anderson. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
A User’s Guide to Trump v. Anderson, Part Seven: Trump’s Two Remaining “Off-Ramp” Arguments: (i) That Colorado has Implemented a De Facto Extraconstitutional Presidential Qualification, in Violation of Term Limits v. Thornton; and (ii) That Colorado has Abused its Article II Authority to Appoint Presidential Electors in a “Manner” of that Colorado Law Doesn’t Authorize
7 Feb 2024, 2:35 pm by Marty Lederman
Senator); Anderson v. [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
A User’s Guide to Trump v. Anderson, Part Seven: Trump’s Two Remaining “Off-Ramp” Arguments: (i) That Colorado has Implemented a De Facto Extraconstitutional Presidential Qualification, in Violation of Term Limits v. Thornton; and (ii) That Colorado has Abused its Article II Authority to Appoint Presidential Electors in a “Manner” of Appointment that Colorado Law Doesn’t Authorize
7 Feb 2024, 2:02 pm by Marty Lederman
Senator); Anderson v. [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
A User’s Guide to Trump v. Anderson, Part Six: The Two “Off-Ramp” Arguments Based Upon In re Griffin’s Case that Would Allow the Supreme Court to Avoid Deciding Whether Trump is Eligible to be President
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm by Marty Lederman
  If you’re interested, good places to start are Part II-C of the Baude/Paulsen article, and Part I-E of Kim Roosevelt’s amicus brief. [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
:@WilliamBaude: The Objection: "But He Hasn't Been Convicted Of Anything"
5 Feb 2024, 5:05 am by Will Baude
Anderson asserts (pp. 38-40) that Section Three can only be enforced following a criminal conviction under 18 U.S.C. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
A User’s Guide to Trump v. Anderson, Interim Post: Two Important Things All the Parties Get Wrong, and One Other Important Thing They Don’t Address
2 Feb 2024, 7:27 am by Marty Lederman
  The Anderson Plaintiffs, for example, represent (Br. at 12) that the Colorado Supreme Court held that “states have constitutional power to enforce Section 3 through ballot access laws” and (p. 52) that the Colorado Election Code “allows voters to sue for enforcement of federal constitutional qualifications at the ballot-access stage. [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
[Josh Blackman] Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar Retreat From Their "Global" Rule for the "Offices" and "Officers" of the Constitution
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm by Josh Blackman
Anderson, the Section 3 case. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/