Search for: "Ex Parte Bell"
Results 81 - 100
of 282
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jan 2018, 10:24 pm
He was charged as part of an ongoing federal investigation into corruption at City Hall. [read post]
11 Jan 2018, 9:01 pm
Part of the problem is knowing how to sift through reams of information. [read post]
31 Dec 2017, 1:46 pm
Ex-DOJ Senior Litigation Counsel. [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 9:30 am
Trump panel: United States ex rel. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 4:10 am
Although he accepted that there is no general duty to give reasons at common law (at para 51), Lord Carnwath took the view, following R v Home Secretary, ex parte Doody [1994] 1 AC 531, that reasons will be required where they are necessary to permit the courts to scrutinise the underlying decision effectively: Although planning law is a creature of statute, the proper interpretation of the statute is underpinned by general principles, properly referred to as derived from… [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 7:01 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 12:47 pm
., File No. 2017-CFPB-0018, Doc. 1 (“TSI Consent Order”).1 1 Available at http://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/201709_cfpb_transworld-systems_consent-order.pdf The TSI Consent Order requires TSI to undertake certain tasks as part of prospective injunctive relief. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 12:47 pm
., File No. 2017-CFPB-0018, Doc. 1 (“TSI Consent Order”).1 1 Available at http://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/201709_cfpb_transworld-systems_consent-order.pdf The TSI Consent Order requires TSI to undertake certain tasks as part of prospective injunctive relief. [read post]
12 Nov 2017, 12:25 pm
For the following reasons, the motion is GRANTED in part (as to Counts III-VI) and DENIED in part (as to Counts I and II).BackgroundJoan Baye had debt. [read post]
12 Nov 2017, 12:25 pm
For the following reasons, the motion is GRANTED in part (as to Counts III-VI) and DENIED in part (as to Counts I and II).BackgroundJoan Baye had debt. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 3:56 pm
Spouses who pay out alimony, child support, or family support will no longer get any tax benefit for the share of the income they give to an ex-spouse. [read post]
10 Sep 2017, 3:07 pm
Plaintiff requests a third of her total legal fees accrued through the date of judgment, but does not suggest how this number relates specifically to the claims against Transworld, who is one of numerous Defendants in this matter and who did not file any of the dispositive motions briefed by the parties and decided by the Court.Although it is the Plaintiff's burden to support her fee request, see Hutchinson ex rel. [read post]
30 Aug 2017, 6:30 pm
A legal practitioner’s first line of remedy-defense should be an ex parte motion to have the court staff redact the offending information and purge the records of such information. [read post]
11 Aug 2017, 4:02 pm
The mainstream media get a pretty clean bill of health from an impressive line-up of commentators including Raymond Snoddy, a ’veteran media commentator’ formerly of the Financial Times and the Times, Dominic Ponsford, editor of the trade journal Press Gazette, Ian Katz, editor of BBC Newsnight and a former Guardian journalist, and Emily Bell, also ex-Guardian and now an academic in the US. [read post]
2 Aug 2017, 4:10 am
In Ex parte Tiara Brooke Lycans, (AL App., July 28, 2017), an Alabama appellate court refused to issue a writ of mandamus ordering a trial judge who also serves as a preacher of a fundamentalist Christian church to recuse himself in a divorce action in which the wife, a lesbian, feared bias in the judge's custody ruling. [read post]
29 Jul 2017, 5:32 pm
Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (quoting Bell Atl. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 11:33 pm
As part of the Twombly-Iqbal analysis, the court proceeds in two steps. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 10:45 am
As the court stated in 1950 in United States ex rel. [read post]
8 Jun 2017, 4:04 pm
Associate Judge Bell had applied Jameel to strike out the former first defendant as a party to the proceeding. [read post]
23 Apr 2017, 1:18 pm
Crane, supra.The court concludes this part of its opinion by explaining thatCratsley moved for summary judgment,arguing that since New York State does not recognize a duty to control the actions of a third party, there existed no special relationship between Cratsley and the Plaintiff that would give rise to any special duty. [read post]
