Search for: "Ex Parte Crisp"
Results 1 - 20
of 36
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Apr 2014, 10:10 pm
Our friend John Welch over at the TTABlog efficiently explains the CAFC’s genericness precedent this way (albeit in the ex parte context): “[T]he PTO’s evidentiary burden in establishing genericness ‘is different depending on the type of mark an applicant seeks to register. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 10:01 pm
Remember, heading down to the courthouse on December 24th at 2:00 pm to attempt to get an ex-parte emergency order is not the ideal way to spend your holidays. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 10:01 pm
Remember, heading down to the courthouse on December 24th at 2:00 pm to attempt to get an ex-parte emergency order is not the ideal way to spend your holidays. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 7:09 pm
Remember, heading down to the courthouse on December 24th at 2:00 pm to attempt to get an ex-parte emergency order is not the ideal way to spend your holidays. [read post]
19 May 2021, 3:16 am
" The Board noted that it must resolve any reasonable doubt in favor of the applicant "on the theory that any person who believes that he would be damaged by the registration will have an opportunity ... to oppose the registration of the mark and to present evidence, usually not present in the ex parte application, to that effect. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 5:32 pm
—===— From the law:/dev/null archives: Life Comes at You Fast (Part V) (10/09/15) [this post] Life Comes at You Fast (Part IV) (08/17/15) Life Comes at You Fast (Part III) (05/28/15) Life Comes at You Fast (Part II) (05/25/15) Life Comes at You Fast (Part I) (05/22/15) Seriously, these things are now industry standards! [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 3:25 am
The decisions in THE SLANTS and in PRETZEL CRISPS cases were argued earlier this month at the CAFC.Amanda BlackhorseSection 2(a) - Immoral or Scandalous: WYHA? [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 3:26 am
[Yes]Precedential No. 5: "Family of Marks" Doctrine Inapplicable in Ex Parte Context, Says TTABWYHA? [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 5:32 pm
—===— From the law:/dev/null archives: Life Comes at You Fast (Part V) (10/09/15) [this post] Life Comes at You Fast (Part IV) (08/17/15) Life Comes at You Fast (Part III) (05/28/15) Life Comes at You Fast (Part II) (05/25/15) Life Comes at You Fast (Part I) (05/22/15) Seriously, these things are now industry standards! [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 5:32 pm
—===— From the law:/dev/null archives: Life Comes at You Fast (Part V) (10/09/15) [this post] Life Comes at You Fast (Part IV) (08/17/15) Life Comes at You Fast (Part III) (05/28/15) Life Comes at You Fast (Part II) (05/25/15) Life Comes at You Fast (Part I) (05/22/15) Seriously, these things are now industry standards! [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 2:12 am
[No]CAFC Vacates PRETZEL CRISPS Decision: TTAB Misapplied Genericness TestPrecedential No. 13: TTAB Finds BUYAUTOPARTS.COM Generic for .... [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 6:49 am
For my part, I exchanged occasional cordial letters and, later, emails with Keegan beginning in the early 1990s. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 6:54 am
For my part, I exchanged occasional cordial letters and, later, emails with Keegan beginning in the early 1990s. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 7:44 am
Promoting the mood enhancing elements of the drug is a big part of it. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 6:44 am
For my part, I exchanged occasional cordial letters and, later, emails with Keegan beginning in the early 1990s. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 2:18 am
Sun during the day and evenings cosied up on the settee with crisps and Sangria giggling over some dodgy pirate videos bought from a local shop (4 for 15 Euros). [read post]
1 Sep 2013, 10:04 am
Crisp, 211 Ga. 636, 641 (1955); Brunswick & Western Railroad Co. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 7:48 am
Whereas rules are thought to limit case-by-case discretion through crisp ex ante directives, standards leave much of their content to be worked out by future enforcers and interpreters. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 3:00 am
The most important case in this area is Ex Parte United States, 287 U.S. 241 (1932). [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 4:59 am
Or the fact that Stephens was apologetic and contrite whereas Crisp wasn’t? [read post]
