Search for: "Ex Parte Crouch"
Results 61 - 80
of 160
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Sep 2022, 7:31 pm
by Dennis Crouch U.S. ex rel Silbersher v. [read post]
13 Jul 2014, 6:31 pm
Congress maintained the less-powerful but still important third-party requested ex parte reexamination. [read post]
19 Nov 2017, 10:33 am
by Dennis Crouch Columbia Sportswear v. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 11:10 am
In Ex parte Yamaguchi (USPTO, August 28, 2008), the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences held that U.S. provisional patent applications act as prior art under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
25 May 2021, 3:13 pm
Certificate of Unenforceability: The second proposed amendment alters the ex parte reexamination statute. [read post]
29 Oct 2011, 7:39 pm
Among the defendants are seven ex- railroad workers (including an ex-federal railroad pension agency employee and a former union president) two doctors, and an office manager. [read post]
The Paramount Interest in Seeing that Patent Monopolies . . . are Kept Within their Legitimate Scope
31 Jan 2014, 5:05 am
By Dennis Crouch Courts have often identified patent rights as a form of monopoly. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 1:49 pm
” At least some of the patents in the case are in the midst of ex parte reexaminations that have been ongoing for some time. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 4:22 am
A burly-looking ex-policeman type had called at his office and handed the papers to him personally. [read post]
20 May 2011, 11:07 am
In Ex Parte Schneidereit, 2009 WL 798905 (Bd. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 11:35 am
by Dennis Crouch Toyota Motor Corp. v. [read post]
16 May 2014, 4:43 am
By Dennis Crouch and David Hricik Kelley Drye & Warren, LLP v. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 8:01 am
This goes beyond the also-cited old case of Ex parte Adams, 84 Off. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 2:04 pm
In Ex Parte Miyazaki, 89 USPQ2d 1207 (B.P.A.I. 2008), the Board of Patent Appeals revived the old precedent of Halliburton Oil Well Cementing Co. v. [read post]
7 Sep 2015, 7:13 pm
by Dennis Crouch Dome Patent v. [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 10:40 am
by Dennis Crouch In re Aspen Aerogels, Inc. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 4:33 am
Ex parte Jepson, 1917 C.D. 62, 243 O.G. 526. [read post]
20 Oct 2017, 9:32 am
Note the difference between affirmance rates in ex parte-type proceedings versus the rates in inter partes-type proceedings. [read post]
19 Sep 2022, 8:46 am
May 21, 2018); Ex Parte Erhart, APPEAL 2019-004505, 2021 WL 195811 (Patent Tr. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 7:43 am
A One Year Deadline will be instituted for filing requests for ex part reexamination triggered by service of a complaint alleging infringement. [read post]
