Search for: "Ex Parte Department of Mental Health and Mental Retardation"
Results 1 - 11
of 11
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Apr 2007, 10:13 pm
[See Ex Parte James Lee Clark, WR-37,288-02.] [read post]
12 Nov 2016, 1:13 pm
The statute, in part, provides: “A magistrate shall release a defendant on personal bond unless good cause is shown otherwise if the: (1) defendant is not charged with or has not been previously convicted of a violent offense; (2) defendant is examined by the local mental health or mental retardation authority or another mental health expert under Article 16.22 of [the Code of Criminal Procedure]; (3) applicable expert, in a… [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 1:18 am
Davis is not mentally retarded. 3 Clemency because Dr. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 3:30 am
Coupled with a general lack of mental health treatment outside the justice system, state legislative policy is turning county jails into de facto mental asylums. [read post]
2 May 2010, 1:12 pm
App. 4/28/2010) (unpublished) Summary denial of mental retardation claim. [read post]
9 May 2010, 9:14 pm
” Ex parte David Lee Lewis, NO. [read post]
12 Jul 2007, 1:19 am
Title228
S6318
GRIFFO -- Provides for the election of delegates to a national party convention or a national party conference 227
S6313
NOZZOLIO -- Relates to limitations against the appointment of non-uniformed persons whose duties include overall security of the department of corrections in the city of New York 226
S6310
LEIBELL -- Relates to agreements relating to marriage 225
S6072
PADAVAN -- Extends for 1… [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 5:17 pm
Whitley, No. 06-0131 In a criminal law matter, petition for review of decision denying rehearing is denied where the court declined to depart from the literal wording of the "except" clause of 18 U.S.C. section 924(c)(1)(A). . [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 12:47 pm
., concurring in part and concurring in the judgment). [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 1:09 pm
Burns, No. 07-5942 Dismissal of pro se prisoner's civil rights action against fourteen judges and justices of various Tennessee courts in their official capacities is affirmed in part and vacated in part where: 1) contrary to the ruling below, the Rooker-Feldman doctrine does not apply to plaintiff's facial constitutional challenge to Tennessee statutes governing collateral review; but 2) an as-applied challenge was barred under the Rooker-Feldman doctrine. [read post]
13 May 2022, 4:36 am
As part of the Attorney Discipline Program, individuals can submit complaints about their attorney’s conduct, which the EOIR investigates. [read post]
