Search for: "Ex Parte Ford"
Results 21 - 40
of 255
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Nov 2022, 4:00 am
Part of the appeal with Ford parts, is that Ford guarantees their products. [read post]
28 Aug 2022, 5:46 am
The National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and former President Donald Trump are locked in a long running dispute over records taken from the White House in January 2021. [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 5:00 am
The Third District Court of Appeal reversed in part. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 4:00 am
National/Federal 2022 Primary Results: Alabama Senate runoff, D.C. and Virginia primaries CBS News – Fin Gómez and Aaron Navarro | Published: 6/21/2022 Virginia and the District of Columbia held primaries on June 21 and Georgia also held runoff elections, but perhaps the most closely watched race was the Alabama Republican U.S. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 5:05 pm
”[9] Although the piece was labeled “editorial,” the journal provided no disclaimer that Wasserstein was not speaking ex cathedra. [read post]
20 May 2022, 1:24 pm
Background The case involves the redevelopment of a part of the former Fort Ord in the City of Seaside in Monterey County. [read post]
17 May 2022, 3:38 am
The third part addresses the changes in methodology adopted and some of the rules so far proposed by the drafters of the future new Restatement. [read post]
26 Feb 2022, 6:53 pm
”[9] Although the piece was labeled “editorial,” the journal provided no disclaimer that Wasserstein was not speaking ex cathedra. [read post]
24 Nov 2021, 10:03 am
Part of the appeal with Ford parts, is that Ford guarantees their products. [read post]
28 Oct 2021, 1:53 pm
Sirois bought each of them a new Ford Explorer as a company car. [read post]
4 Sep 2021, 4:50 pm
The father argued that he had not been given the opportunity to oppose the second hearing; that he had not been allowed sufficient time to respond to the application; that the arbitrator had held an ex parte hearing with his wife’s lawyer regarding procedure; and that 15 minutes for oral submissions was insufficient. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
Lawmakers have also attempted to retroactively undo parts of initiatives approved by voters in some states. [read post]
18 Jul 2021, 4:15 pm
There were opaque references to Korematsu and Hirabayashi as "two wartime cases," but nothing about Ex Parte Endo: The Supreme Court upheld the President's Executive order in two wartime cases. [read post]
14 Jul 2021, 7:51 am
Presidents can, however, substantially mitigate this ex post downside risk if they get Congress “on the record” in support of a use of force ex ante. [read post]
11 Jun 2021, 4:00 am
An industry of firms that provide voter data to pollsters, campaigns, and others has been trying to find the best way to parse specific parts of voters’ identities like religion, race, and ethnicity. [read post]
23 Apr 2021, 7:37 am
It's as though Toyota and Ford announced that they were merging, and then, two days later, dropped the whole idea. [read post]
16 Apr 2021, 4:00 am
Democracy Watch alleges former MP Peter Van Loan’s lobbying of Premier Doug Ford and Transportation Minister Caroline Mulroney created a conflict-of-interest. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 9:01 pm
It is truly odd that lawyers across the political spectrum have acted as if the provision creating the pardon power is unambiguous, when it is anything but.The Supreme Court case to which naïve reporters point, 1866’s Ex Parte Garland, does indeed say that the pardon power is “unlimited,” but that opinion then very clearly describes a pardon power that is in fact limited. [read post]
5 Mar 2021, 3:00 am
Canada Canada – Ontario Law Would Restrict Election Spending by Third-Party Groups, Double Donation Limits for Individuals Toronto Star – Robert Benzie | Published: 2/25/2021 Ontario Premier Doug Ford’ Progressive Conservatives have unveiled proposed campaign finance changes, doubling annual donation caps to $3,300, extending per-vote subsidies for political parties, and limiting PAC spending. [read post]
24 Feb 2021, 9:01 pm
A January 26 piece asserts confidently that “[t]he Supreme Court has ruled that the Constitution gives presidents unlimited authority to grant pardons,” but the link embedded in “pardons” leads to another Times column that does not support that assertion.What these journalists seem to be relying upon, other than citing each other’s unsourced assertions, is the Court’s 1866 decision in Ex Parte Garland. [read post]
