Search for: "Ex Parte Grant"
Results 41 - 60
of 5,611
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2024, 1:19 am
Internet and Social Media On 31 January 2024, Part 10 of the Online Safety Act came into force. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 7:53 pm
The court ruled as follows (only relevant parts are reproduced here. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 10:58 am
In emergency situations, which are cases involving imminent danger or threat of danger, a judge may grant a TRO ex parte, which means that it is without a formal hearing with the opposing party. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 3:00 am
The statements were filed as part of a lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of a new state law limiting release of the governor’s travel records. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 3:00 am
Certiorari granted in Trump immunity case. [read post]
24 Feb 2024, 1:10 pm
Ex parte: the law is whatever the judge will sign. [read post]
24 Feb 2024, 7:49 am
The latest buzzword in the internet divorce community is the “silver bullet divorce” A silver bullet divorce is a divorce that starts with an emergency order of protection (which is almost always heard ex parte…without the accused even being present. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 2:15 am
Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), in particular working on ex parte reexamination proceedings, post-grant petitions (IPR, PGR, and CBM), or other administrative drafting and litigation experience. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 2:15 am
Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), in particular working on ex parte reexamination proceedings, post-grant petitions (IPR, PGR, and CBM), or other administrative drafting and litigation experience. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 8:08 am
In any event, however, they were not criticising the right to apply to set aside leave granted ex parte. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 7:28 am
This post summarizes the published criminal opinions from the North Carolina Court of Appeals released on February 20, 2024. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am
On the contrary, all of them apparently took for granted that he was one of the officers of the United States to which Article VI refers. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 3:00 am
The most important case in this area is Ex Parte United States, 287 U.S. 241 (1932). [read post]
18 Feb 2024, 12:02 pm
It’s a reminder that ex parte proceedings, especially the SAD Scheme, are riddled with such evidentiary and doctrinal overclaims, and judges can’t catch them all. [read post]
18 Feb 2024, 10:22 am
Circuit’s requirements for relying on an ex parte declaration had been met; and (2) agency sufficiently demonstrated that three-decades old information protected by the attorney-client privileged met the foreseeable harm test. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 12:34 pm
” By retracting this more controversial part of his earlier order, Justice Engoron may have also helped insulate his decision from the possibility of a reversal on appeal. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 12:15 am
Section 1798.201 provides: A person who has learned or reasonably suspects that his or her personal identifying information has been used unlawfully, as described in subdivision (a) of Section 530.5 of the Penal Code, in a business entity filing, and has initiated a law enforcement investigation in accordance with subdivision (a) of Section 530.6 of the Penal Code, may petition the superior court in the county in which the person resides for an order, which may be granted… [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 3:33 pm
(Recall that the Anderson respondents urged the Court to grant the Trump and Republican Party petitions for certiorari because “the weighty Fourteenth Amendment questions here warrant the Court’s attention even in the absence of a split, and this case presents an ideal vehicle for resolving them. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 4:10 am
T.J.,[3] Plaintiff filed Chapter 50B forms to obtain a DVPO against Defendant, her ex-girlfriend. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 1:14 pm
Supreme Court held: (1) statutory provision that authorized ex parte communications between a workers’ compensation claimant’s health care provider and claimant’s medical providers was facially unconstitutional; (2) WCC was not required to conduct the two-part test set forth in Katz v. [read post]
