Search for: "Ex Parte Harmon"
Results 121 - 140
of 173
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Sep 2013, 7:56 pm
For this post we consider the first part of section II of the materials: II.C. [read post]
8 May 2013, 7:00 am
MIP filed a notice of opposition ex Article 42 of Regulation 40/94 (Article 41 CTMR), relying on Article 8(1)(b) of the same Regulation. macros consult GmbH, on the other hand, submitted an application for a declaration of invalidity of MIP's figurative sign, under Articles 52(1)(c) and 55 of Regulation 40/94 (Articles 53(1)(c) and 56 CTMR). [read post]
13 Apr 2013, 5:38 am
Part I can be found here. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 11:24 am
Clarified that § 11.305 (relating to prohibited ex parte communications with, e.g., judges, administrative patent and trademark judges, and "employee[s] or officer[s] of the Office") does not "prevent ex parte communication that is authorized by law, rule or court order, in an ex parte proceeding." [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 10:59 am
Peter-Andreas Brand: Cross-border consumer protection within the EU – Inconsistencies and contradictions in the European System of Conflict of Law Rules and Procedural Law The endeavours throughout the European Union to create a harmonized European Procedural Law, in particular in the context of jurisdiction and recognition and enforcement, and also the process of harmonisation of the Conflict of Law Rules within the EU have realised the importance of cross-border consumer… [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 7:08 pm
The Preface also emphasizes the hybridity of the structure of the MNE Guidelines: They provide a voluntary framework for responsible business behavior that seeks to harmonizes domestic laws and international conventions and norms, a voluntary standard that adhering states bind themselves to implement, which remain distinct from both national law and the international commitments of adhering states (both of which, unlike the MNE Guidelines themselves) are legally binding in a… [read post]
13 Jan 2013, 9:30 pm
Legislators are not likely to want to cede control over legislation to future Congresses of which they may not be a part. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 1:22 pm
Prior to this new addition, the only ways to challenge the validity of a patent were to see ex parte or inter partes reexamination before the Patent Office. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 5:36 am
Part of that articulation might not actually be most desirable as a boundary condition, channeling patent/copyright and TM, but instead as an intrinsic limit. [read post]
7 Apr 2012, 2:37 am
To find out whether he is ultimately rehabilitated by Pharaoh or takes the path of class traitor, be sure to read Part III. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 8:59 pm
-> Latest China Hearsay: A Harmonized Introduction to the Passover Holiday – Part I http://t.co/flkIHwwH -> RT @KaiserKuo: New Sinica Podcast: The end of the Expat Package? [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am
These works included a treatise on bills of exchange, a treatise on pleading, yet another on pleading and assumpsit, commentaries on the law of bailments, a biography, and even a book of poetry titled The Power of Solitude: A Poem in Two Parts. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 9:00 pm
The post points out how it is important to understand the method of organization and the types of activities that are causing a paradigm shift in the world of patents and innovation. 2) Patently-O: New Post Grant Options and Associated Proposed Fees - This post lists the new fees for petition for post-grant opposition or covered business method patent review, a petition for inter partes review, a petition for ex parte reexamination, supplemental examination, derivation,… [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 9:00 pm
The post points out how it is important to understand the method of organization and the types of activities that are causing a paradigm shift in the world of patents and innovation. 2) Patently-O: New Post Grant Options and Associated Proposed Fees - This post lists the new fees for petition for post-grant opposition or covered business method patent review, a petition for inter partes review, a petition for ex parte reexamination, supplemental examination, derivation,… [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 9:00 pm
The post points out how it is important to understand the method of organization and the types of activities that are causing a paradigm shift in the world of patents and innovation. 2) Patently-O: New Post Grant Options and Associated Proposed Fees - This post lists the new fees for petition for post-grant opposition or covered business method patent review, a petition for inter partes review, a petition for ex parte reexamination, supplemental examination, derivation,… [read post]
Review of the Effects of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act on Third Party Participation Applicants
1 Feb 2012, 9:15 am
James G. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 3:43 pm
” This is a higher standard than the ex parte “substantial new question of patentability. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 3:17 am
Century LLC (EDTexweblog.com) US Trade Marks – Decisions What a Betty Boop boo – part 3, the adventure continues… 9th Circuit Court of Appeals issues amended opinion in Fleischer Studios, Inc v. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 3:02 pm
Finally, the Act provides that new “Micro Entities” shall have their fees reduced by 75%, as discussed in part N. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 3:00 am
In 1973, the General Assembly enacted the Tennessee Governmental Tort Liability Act (GTLA), which waived in part the immunity previously afforded to governmental entities. [read post]
