Search for: "Ex Parte Hobbs" Results 61 - 69 of 69
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Aug 2010, 2:19 pm by Lawrence Solum
The ex ante/ex post distinction is all about normative perspective. [read post]
21 May 2009, 1:04 am
Here's a link to my summary of the underlying case.PD-0381-09, Ex parte David Garza: The CCA granted the State's petition for discretionary review with oral argument in this DWI case out of Harris County on the following issues:1. [read post]
12 Apr 2009, 4:31 pm
The ex ante/ex post distinction is all about normative perspective. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 6:15 pm
Carter, No. 06-2412 In a prosecution for extortion under the Hobbs Act, defen [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 9:47 am
Gray, No. 05-4482, 06-3086, 06-3209 Defendants' convictions for various offenses convictions, which stemmed from their alleged schemes to procure government contracts for corporate clients and financial gains for themselves by illicitly providing money and gifts to public officials in exchange for political influence in the bid for municipal contracts, are affirmed in part and reversed in part where: 1) the district court did not err in concluding that various purported… [read post]
4 Jan 2008, 9:28 pm
Further, in an ex parte re-exam, after the USPTO has granted the request, there is basically no further action required by the requestor. [read post]
16 Dec 2007, 4:19 am
The ex ante/ex post distinction is all about normative perspective. [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 2:47 am
Harris County Bail Bond Bd., No. 05-20714 A decision finding that a Texas statute restricting solicitation of potential customers denied bail bondsmen their First Amendment rights is affirmed in part and reversed in part where all but one of the restrictions violated the bondsmen's right to commercial speech. [read post]