Search for: "Ex Parte Loring"
Results 21 - 33
of 33
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jan 2010, 10:45 am
BANKERS – THE ONLY PEOPLE JESUS EVER SHOUTED AT The Fuckpig is part of a series of paintings I did over Christmas to amuse myself and have a mild dig at the pretentious nature of some modern art. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 3:00 am
Cummings, CV 05-7782 PA (Ex) (C.D. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 3:54 pm
Investors would pay ex ante for any benefit received ex post-and the bar would pocket a substantial portion of the transfer payments. [read post]
30 Mar 2008, 12:23 am
On 17 March 2008, there was a decision merging the inter partes and ex parte proceedings. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 3:44 am
McCartney divorce battle: The full judgement part 2 which according to this post on Pink Tape, Mills McCartney Award Announced - and Judgment published in full, was leaked rather than officially issued by the judge.Marilyn Stowe's McCartney divorce: Lucky Heather Mills? [read post]
28 Feb 2008, 11:40 pm
The declarations of Trounson, Loring, and Melton (which have relevance ONLY to the inter partes proceeding as to US 7,209,913) had no impact on the USPTO decision. [read post]
28 Feb 2008, 8:19 am
The decisions in the "ex parte" re-exams remain to be made. [read post]
19 Feb 2008, 4:18 pm
However, the real fear here, and what troubles me about this situation, is the way that the original judge hearing the application (ex parte, i.e. without the involvement of the defendants at this stage) appears to have used a pretty big hammer for this nail. [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 1:18 am
civil law on breach of a financial settlement retaining an ex spouses personal propertyIf the settlement has been incorporated into a financial/property order, then you should apply to the court to enforce the order. [read post]
26 Dec 2007, 5:10 am
"Adjusted Penalties for Crack May Aid Ex-Ballplayer's Case": The Washington Post today contains an article that begins, "Willie Mays Aikens is a part of baseball lore. [read post]
4 Jul 2007, 1:57 am
Now that they have responded to WARF's response, the patent office is expected to issue a final ruling within a few months.IPBiz notes that in ex parte re-exams, relevant to two of the re-exams here, the initially challenging party does NOT get to respond to the patentee's response to the initial Office Action. [read post]
28 May 2007, 3:54 pm
Taken as a part of the divorce, the Court may be more willing to make an Order as a part of the proceedings. [read post]
3 Oct 2006, 2:45 pm
-------------------You can also follow the Reexamination proceedings on the USPTO's PAIR system:US Patent 5,843,780 ex-parte reexamination proceeding (90/008,102)US Patent 6,200,806 ex-parte reexamination proceeding (90/008,139)US Patent 7,029,913 inter-partes reexamination proceeding (95/000,154 ) [read post]
