Search for: "Ex Parte Martinez" Results 21 - 40 of 110
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Sep 2021, 12:51 pm by Rohini Kurup
The court reasoned that the in camera, ex parte procedure did not apply to non-FISA claims. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 6:35 am by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
Martinez tiene su propia firma llamada “Diseño radical”, a través de cuyos trabajos de arquitectura de paisaje fomenta la calidad de vida y el bienestar, la sustentabilidad, la equidad social y la cultura local. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 7:24 pm by Gideon
Just like SCOTUS in Smith, the Letalien court concludes that SORNA is civil in nature and then engages in a discussion of the seven Mendoza-Martinez factors to determine if a statute that is intended to be civil will be found to be an ex post facto law. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 7:49 am by Graham Smith
It asks questions around mere accessibility as a threshold for jurisdiction (as found in Pez Hejduk) and the eDate/Martinez ‘centre of interests’ criterion for recovery in respect of the entire harm suffered throughout the EU. [read post]
1 Aug 2008, 2:43 pm
This is the key part of how the court resolved the ex post facto claim in United States v. [read post]
16 Sep 2017, 4:00 pm by Embajador Microjuris al Día
§ 666, el Tribunal señala que durante el juicio las partes estipularon que en el 2005 Martínez Maldonado era parte de una agencia puertorriqueña que se benefició con más de $10,000 en fondos federales porque el gobierno recibió más de 4.7 billones de dólares en fondos federales. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 9:08 am by CJLF Staff
Dimas-Martinez's lawyers also complained that another juror slept during court proceedings. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 7:27 pm by SOIssues
"I am seeing more, that's for sure," said Martinez attorney David Briggs. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 7:49 am by Graham Smith
It asks questions around mere accessibility as a threshold for jurisdiction (as found in Pez Hejduk) and the eDate/Martinez ‘centre of interests’ criterion for recovery in respect of the entire harm suffered throughout the EU. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 10:52 am by Graham Smith
Cross-border liability and jurisdictionIlsjan (Case C-194/16) is another CJEU reference on the Article 7(2) (ex-Art 5(3)) tort jurisdiction provisions of the EU Jurisdiction Regulation. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 10:52 am by Graham Smith
Cross-border liability and jurisdictionIlsjan (Case C-194/16) is another CJEU reference on the Article 7(2) (ex-Art 5(3)) tort jurisdiction provisions of the EU Jurisdiction Regulation. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 3:00 pm by Amy Howe
  And although some Justices appeared to agree with the federal government that there is no right to sue in Medicaid cases like this, others questioned whether private parties should ever be able to sue states to enforce federal laws – a right that almost everyone had (at least until Monday) regarded as well-established, dating back to the Court’s decision over a century ago in a case called Ex parte Young. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 9:41 am by Aaron
Brown’s execution was dictated in part by the fact that the State’s existing inventory of sodium thiopental, to be used in Mr. [read post]
22 Jan 2017, 2:21 am by INFORRM
Cross-border liability and jurisdiction Ilsjan (Case C-194/16) is another CJEU reference on the Article 7(2) (ex-Art 5(3)) tort jurisdiction provisions of the EU Jurisdiction Regulation. [read post]