Search for: "Ex Parte Mason" Results 141 - 150 of 150
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Aug 2008, 8:40 am
While ex parte reexamination does not create litigation estoppel de facto, it comes fairly close to doing so.Read/download Chiang's article here (link) [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 6:07 pm
Elkhart County Office of Family and Children (NFP) Michael and Vicky Mason v. [read post]
19 May 2008, 8:55 am
Quarterman, No. 07-70017 An application for a certificate of appealability (COA) from a denial of a petition for a writ of habeas corpus is denied in part and granted in part where: 1) the decision not to test DNA evidence from the crime scene did not rise to ineffective assistance of counsel since it was an informed, strategic decision; 2) failure to impeach a witness does not amount to a serious error ; 3) failure to present evidence that defendant was allergic to codeine caused… [read post]
19 May 2008, 8:47 am
Westly, No. 07-16902, 07-17223 In long-running litigation involving the constitutionality of California's statutory procedure addressing escheat, grant of a motion to dissolve an injunction preventing the operation of California's escheat process is affirmed in part and reversed in part where: 1) on its face, the state's new procedure complies with the due process standard previously established by the Supreme Court; 2) there was no abuse of discretion in dissolving… [read post]
15 Mar 2008, 4:10 am
Moreover, their brief goes on, Article VII was only a part of a larger movement to vindicate the supremacy of Parliament. [read post]
2 Feb 2008, 12:42 am
For the second quarter and part of the third, there was no visible 24-second clock at all -- instead the arena announcer, Mark Mason, had to announce "15... 10... 5... 4... 3... 2... [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 6:49 am
"Mason was overruled in part by State v. [read post]
14 Feb 2007, 6:31 pm
  Scalia writes that: "The Framers would be astounded to learn that ex parte testimony could be admitted against a criminal defendant [in a state court trial] because it was elicited by 'neutral' government officers. [read post]
30 Jan 2007, 4:38 am
"The larceny and coercion charges at stake are part of DA Charles Hynes long-time efforts to root out corruption in the purchase of judicial robes.Given the possibility of additional indictments from ongoing investigations, and a new scandal that came to light last week from the ex-wife of former Supreme Court Justice Reynold Mason (who alleges payments were made for Democratic party backing), the problems (and press) will continue to be bad for one of my favorite… [read post]