Search for: "Ex Parte Nice" Results 21 - 40 of 641
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Dec 2007, 6:16 am
(How nice that the procedural history of all three of the consolidated cases followed the same path. [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 3:18 pm by Carl Folsom
Here is a nice amicus curiae brief (written by Doug Berman, Wayne Logan, and Corey Yung) that argues that SORNA violates the Ex Post Facto Clause of the U.S. [read post]
26 Mar 2016, 11:40 am by Georgialee Lang
Ghomeshi’s cute, bright yellow Volkswagen “bug” gave her a sense of comfort that he was a kind, nice guy. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 8:11 pm
But in the case of Ex parte Denison, credit goes to the Florida Patent Lawyer blog -- he discussed the Denison decision here. [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 2:36 pm by Wendy Fried
An ex of mine had a motto: “Never apologize, never explain. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 12:11 pm by G.A. Napier
There is a nice little Kentucky Supreme Court opinion called Howard v Howard, 336 S.W.3d 433 (Ky. 2011) every Kentucky family lawyer and consumer bankruptcy lawyer should read. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 10:10 am
Last week the PTO released a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking for rules governing ex parte appeals before the BPAI. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 11:51 am by Daniel Corbett
 Here’s a recent post on the applicability of a registrant’s scope of expansion in ex parte proceedings. [read post]
12 Oct 2013, 7:15 am by Daniel Richardson
  And now we have the body bag comment to the ex-girlfriend. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 10:00 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here is the next batch: (3) Ex parte Kan-Gi-Shun-Ca (Crow Dog) (109US556) vs. (14) Bryan v. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 12:02 am
For me, the hardest part of divorce was keeping my head on straight. [read post]
20 Dec 2015, 3:34 pm by familoo
Undertakings in damages required on ex parte non-mols. [read post]
14 Jul 2007, 5:08 pm
Do you suppose RIAA will cite his decision in its future ex parte requests for subpoenas? [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 8:15 am by Andis Kaulins
The USPTO in a non-final Ex Parte Reexamination action has rejected ALL 20 claims of the patent, including claim 19, which is the essential bounce-back part of the patent. [read post]