Search for: "Ex Parte Reed" Results 121 - 140 of 210
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
For an example of this, see R v SoS  for Health, Ex p British American Tobacco et al [2002] ECR I-11453, case, in which the manifestly inappropriate test was applied. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 12:18 pm
This post originates from the non-Reed Smith side of the blog, only.We’re going to take a walk once again onto the uneven ground of ex parte interviews of treating doctors, an area in which Plaintiffs’ counsel too often seem to be handed the higher ground. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 3:06 am by INFORRM
On the same day, there was a return date hearing for an ex parte injunction in the cae of Earley v Winnifrith before Dingemans J. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 3:45 pm
   Along with the filing of the complaint, Hakkasan also sought an ex parte temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction against Miller. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 3:41 am by Janet Kentridge, Matrix
When it considered the very same phrase in R v Salford Health Authority; Ex p Janaway [1989] AC 537, the House of Lords decided that “treatment” meant “the process of treatment in hospital for the termination of pregnancy” and “participate” meant “actually taking part in that process”. [read post]
12 Oct 2014, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
  As part of the settlement, proceeds from the song “Flowers in the Rain” continue to be paid to charity. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 10:49 am by Lisa Baird
The Drug & Device Law blog recently posted an analysis of an interesting case, United States ex rel. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 7:19 am by Aidan O'Neill QC
It cannot be held back, Parliament has decreed that the Treaty is henceforward to be part of our law. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 5:30 am by Renee Kolar
The Future of Class Action Arbitration Part II Part I By: Adam Prom  Ways for class arbitration to survive In light of the above class arbitration jurisprudence, it is evident that the Supreme Court is quite hostile to class arbitration. [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 1:34 am by Dr Jeremias Prassl
In rejecting this point, and the related request for a preliminary reference under Article 267 TFEU, Lord Toulson suggested that EU law as such was not engaged, or in any way manifestly clear, as the CJEU had held in ex parte IATA [at paragraph 42], that claims for damages on an individual basis would be subject to MC exclusivity, and Mr Stott’s claim was so founded. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 6:37 am
  So, of course we want to share with our readers H.R. ex rel. [read post]