Search for: "Ex Parte Rolen"
Results 1 - 3
of 3
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jul 2017, 5:40 pm
Evid. 901(a), 902(10).The Gillespies also objected to the admissibility of portions of the attached, authenticated records: (1) the pool supplement, which supplemented the May 1, 2002 note-purchase agreement between First Marblehead and Bank One; (2) a single page following the pool supplement (the orphan page), which the Trust asserted was included as part of the pool supplement's schedule 1 and showed that the Gillespies' note was included in those pooled for sale; (3) the DAS,… [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 5:00 am
Since we originally wrote that post in mid-2007, prompted by the terrible decision in State ex rel. [read post]
16 Sep 2017, 10:26 am
Evid. 901(a), 902(10).The Gillespies also objected to the admissibility of portions of the attached, authenticated records: (1) the pool supplement, which supplemented the May 1, 2002 note-purchase agreement between First Marblehead and Bank One; (2) a single page following the pool supplement (the orphan page), which the Trust asserted was included as part of the pool supplement's schedule 1 and showed that the Gillespies' note was included in those pooled for sale; (3) the DAS,… [read post]
