Search for: "Ex Parte Russell"
Results 201 - 220
of 226
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Apr 2015, 6:30 am
See Russell v. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 3:00 am
Ex-IRS Contractor Who Leaked Trump’s Tax Returns Sentenced to 5 Years MSN – Salvador Rizzo (Washington Post) | Published: 1/29/2024 A former government contractor who leaked confidential tax records filed by the wealthiest Americans, including those of Donald Trump was sentenced to the maximum of five years in prison. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 11:29 am
I therefore thought I'd blog the text of the draft brief here, and invite all of you to tell me why I'm wrong altogether, why I'm wrong on specific details, how the proposal could be improved, or even what parts of the proposal seem likely to be confusing to the judges. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
Law has developed in large part due to philosophical inquiry, and the study of philosophy remains just as relevant today. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 8:05 am
As far as the future of the global project over climate change is, I would point you to Walter Russell Mead’s new blog essay on Cancun (h/t Instapundit) (for the glass-half-filled view, see this news story from the NYT; note that it is filed from DC and NY, not Cancun). [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 3:00 pm
And although some Justices appeared to agree with the federal government that there is no right to sue in Medicaid cases like this, others questioned whether private parties should ever be able to sue states to enforce federal laws – a right that almost everyone had (at least until Monday) regarded as well-established, dating back to the Court’s decision over a century ago in a case called Ex parte Young. [read post]
3 Jun 2007, 10:27 pm
The best part of sticking with the movie to the end? [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 3:04 am
.” Jeremy Clarke-Williams, Russell Jones Walker, acted for the claimant. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 8:52 am
Abbott, Diane Kindermann, Glen Hansen, Brian Russell and Dan Cucchi Welcome to Abbott & Kindermann’s 2015 Annual CEQA update. [read post]
21 May 2015, 10:19 am
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the petitioner in this case.] [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 4:02 am
In the cases referred to in answers 1(a) to (c), reimbursement of the appeal fee is to be ordered ex officio.3. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 9:48 am
State ex rel. 14th Dist. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 7:24 am
Content warning: This post contains content that may be upsetting for some readers. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 3:00 am
Untangling the mess of their early months in Congress will be an ongoing task for freshman lawmakers, as they figure out what is new because of the pandemic, what is new because of the insurrection, and what is not new at all but just part of the same old partisan in Washington. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 3:00 am
A hedge fund consultant’s assessment of the meeting spread through parts of the investment world and traders spotted the immediate significance: the president’s aides appeared to be giving wealthy party donors an early warning of a potentially impactful contagion at a time when Trump was publicly insisting the threat was nonexistent. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 3:00 am
California – Ex-Palm Springs Mayor Steve Pougnet, Developers Due [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm
The critics and cheerleaders of Dr. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
(Securing Innovation) PriorSmart.com search tool, tracking patent documents (Competitive Info) (Patently-O) Patent damages as an incentive to transact (IP finance) IPscore, new patent evaluation toy (IP finance) Patent portfolios can pull companies out of financial rut (Law360) Global - Copyright Expanding the public domain: part zero (Creative Commons) Australia Pioneering decision on non-use: Pioneer Computers Australia Pty Limited v Pioneer KK (Australian… [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm
To remove a case on a “color of office” argument, the removing party bears the burden of establishing what’s called the three-part “Mesa test,” from the Supreme Court case by that name,[5] The three-part test requires the defendant to show they: were an “officer, or any person acting under that officer, of the United States” are facing criminal charges “for or relating to any act under color of such office”; and have raised or… [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 6:31 pm
See Russell L. [read post]
