Search for: "Ex Parte Scott" Results 241 - 260 of 955
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Sep 2011, 2:00 am by Stefanie Levine
Patent No. 6,274,924, 6,547,249 and 6,590,235 (see inter partes Request Nos. (3) & (4) and ex parte Request No. (6)). [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 7:51 am by Stefanie Levine
Patent Nos. 6,993,669 and 6,408,415 (see inter partes Request No. (3) & ex parte Request No. (31)). [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 7:51 am by Stefanie Levine
Patent Nos. 6,993,669 and 6,408,415 (see inter partes Request No. (3) & ex parte Request No. (31)). [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 4:46 pm by Colin O'Keefe
- West Des Moines attorney Steve Lombardi on his blog, The Iowa Edict Broken Promises, Part 2: Nathan v. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 5:31 am by Stefanie Levine
  A request was also filed against an Affinity Labs content delivery method patent (see ex parte Request No. (3)). [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 10:56 am by Stefanie Levine
The following ex parte requests were filed: (1) 90/011,371 (electronically filed) - U.S. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 5:31 am by Stefanie Levine
  A request was also filed against an Affinity Labs content delivery method patent (see ex parte Request No. (3)). [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 10:56 am by Stefanie Levine
The following ex parte requests were filed: (1) 90/011,371 (electronically filed) - U.S. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 7:28 am by Stefanie Levine
Finally, reexamination was requested of two Sorenson patents that claim systems for exterminating pests (see ex parte Request Nos. (4) & (6)). [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 9:41 am by Stefanie Levine
One pointed out that the accused infringer could reargue its invalidity arguments, even if it lost at the PTO, since it had requested ex parte, not inter partes, reexamination, and therefore was not bound by the PTO's decision. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 9:41 am by Stefanie Levine
One pointed out that the accused infringer could reargue its invalidity arguments, even if it lost at the PTO, since it had requested ex parte, not inter partes, reexamination, and therefore was not bound by the PTO's decision. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 4:49 pm
., which describes itself as “the number one social gaming company with 30 million daily active users,” obtained an ex parte temporary restraining order against its competitor Playdom, Inc. and two former Zynga employees. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 5:19 am by Stefanie Levine
The following ex parte requests were filed: (1) 90/011,738 (electronically filed) - U.S. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 5:19 am by Stefanie Levine
The following ex parte requests were filed: (1) 90/011,738 (electronically filed) - U.S. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 12:29 pm by Stefanie Levine
And the following ex parte requests were filed: (1)  90/011,248 (electronically filed) – U.S. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 8:44 am by Stefanie Levine
Envisionware offered no clear answer as to why ex parte reexamination of the ‘870 Patent was not pursued. [read post]
19 Apr 2007, 11:59 am
We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand with instructions. [read post]