Search for: "Ex Parte Sexton" Results 1 - 8 of 8
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Aug 2020, 10:08 am by Law Lady
Receiverships -- Ex parte -- Mortgage foreclosure -- Error to appoint receiver for property involved in mortgage foreclosure action without providing notice and opportunity to be heard where mortgagee failed to establish that ex parte receivership was necessary to avoid immediate irreparable harm to mortgaged property or that giving notice and holding a hearing would accelerate or precipitate any injury -- Although loan documents contained provision for… [read post]
8 May 2009, 10:08 am by SC Divorce and Disabilty
"The purpose of alimony is to provide the ex-spouse a substitute for the support which was incident to the former marital relationship. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Doug Ducey to tout the perks of the state as part of his effort to be business friendly. [read post]
15 Apr 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
California – Corruption Probe Ends in Ex-San Mateo County Community College District C [read post]
22 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Unapologetic Ex-Ambassador Avoids Prison in Illicit Lobbying Case MSN – Craig Whitlock (Washington Post) | Published: 9/16/2023 Richard Olson Jr., a former U.S. ambassador to Pakistan and the United Arab Emirates, was sentenced to three years’ probation and a $93,350 fine for violating federal lobbying and ethics laws in a case that exposed a secret history of romantic liaisons and lavish gifts during his 34-year career as a diplomat. [read post]
11 Jun 2021, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
An industry of firms that provide voter data to pollsters, campaigns, and others has been trying to find the best way to parse specific parts of voters’ identities like religion, race, and ethnicity. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 1:50 pm
Sexton, No. 05-6412, 05-6415, 05-6416 Defendants' sentences for offenses stemming from the distribution of cocaine, imposed on a remand pursuant to Booker, are affirmed over meritless claims that: 1) the district court violated their Sixth Amendment and due process rights by using its own factual findings to calculate their sentencing ranges under the Guidelines; 2) the sentences exceeded the "maximum statutory sentence" allowable for their offenses; 3) imposition of their… [read post]