Search for: "Ex Parte Smiley" Results 1 - 20 of 31
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Mar 2024, 11:56 am by Eric Goldman
Ex parte proceedings, where the putative rightsowner tells an unrebutted story, are highly likely to get it wrong. [read post]
24 Feb 2024, 1:10 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Ex parte: the law is whatever the judge will sign. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 2:35 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Jose V. v Smiley & Smiley LLP 2023 NY Slip Op 01367 Decided on March 16, 2023 Appellate Division, First Department is a consolidated [read post]
16 Oct 2022, 9:02 pm by Vikram David Amar
Hildebrant (in 1916), to Smiley v. [read post]
1 Mar 2022, 9:00 pm by Vikram David Amar
” This part of Blacker was never quoted, much less explained, by the majority or concurring opinions in the Bush litigation.In any event, if the case for ISL is to be built on Supreme Court authority, twentieth-century decisions—decisions post-Blacker—strongly undercut ISL.Consider first the 1916 case of Ohio ex rel. [read post]
9 Jan 2022, 8:54 am by Eric Goldman
Two hotspots: ex parte proceedings provide far too many gaming opportunities for plaintiffs, and sealed lists of dozens of defendants should be a huge red flag. [read post]
24 Sep 2021, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Court Yahoo News – Josh Gerstein (Politico) | Published: 9/17/2021 For Special Counsel John Durham, obtaining an indictment of lawyer Michael Sussmann for allegedly lying to the FBI during its investigation into the Trump campaign and Russia may turn out to be the easy part. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal After Capitol Riot, Desperate Families Turn to Groups That ‘Deprogram’ Extremists MSN – Paulina Villegas and Hannah Knowles (Washington Post) | Published: 2/5/2021 There is a surge of desperate families and friends calling organizations that aim to deradicalize and “deprogram” extremists across the ideological spectrum. [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 5:23 am by Derek T. Muller
And this is the part of the concurring opinion where Justice Neil Gorsuch, the only other justice who joined part of Justice Thomas’s approach, did not join.Here’s what Justice Elena Kagan (for eight justices) had to say about the clause:Article II, § 1’s appointments power gives the States far-reaching authority over presidential electors, absent some other constitutional constraint. [read post]
18 Nov 2020, 7:30 am by Karen Tani
Preyer Scholars selection committee were Elizabeth Katz, Will Smiley, Anders Walker, Laura Kalman (Chair), Gautham Rao (ex officio), and the late Anne Fleming. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 9:08 am by Guest Blogger
  And directly after the war, in Ex Parte Milligan, the Supreme Court reversed a conviction obtained by the Lincoln Administration’s wartime military commissions. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 6:19 am by Jim Sedor
In one message, which she finished with a smiley-face emoticon, Byrd-Bennett implied she needed cash because she had “tuition to pay and casinos to visit. [read post]