Search for: "Ex Parte Story v. Story" Results 101 - 120 of 1,020
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 May 2011, 4:48 am by Apeng
(IP Watch) (IP Dragon) Human rights trump design rights – District Court of The Hague lifts ex parte injunction against artist in Nadja Plesner v Louis Vuitton / ??????? [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 7:29 pm by Mark Terry
In this past Friday's decision in Ex parte Bass, the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (BPAI) reversed a Patent Examiner's 35 U.S.C. sec. 112, first paragraph, rejection. [read post]
24 May 2015, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
  HHJ Hodge QC granted an ex parte privacy injunction to a person he described as a woman with a “high public profile”. [read post]
25 Aug 2012, 10:09 am by Lori J. Paul, AACP
The most interesting part of this story is Goan is an attorney and should have known better. [read post]
12 Aug 2023, 6:38 am by Andrew Delaney
So father wanted to see copies of those unsuccessful ex-parte applications. [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 3:46 am
(Patent Infringement) District Court E D Texas: Defense wins JMOL at conclusion of plaintiff's case in Marshall patent trial: Southwest EFuel Network, LLC v Transaction Tracking Technologies, LLC (EDTexweblog.com) District Court E D Texas denies stays pending ex parte and inter partes reexam:Zapmedia Services, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 2:18 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  There is a tendency to ex post opportunism: once IP is created, let’s get it shared as widely as possible, but that’s not sustainable on an ongoing basis. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 2:28 am by Peter Mahler
Justice Demarest answered “yes” in a decision earlier this month, in Camuso v Brooklyn Portfolio LLC, 2014 NY Slip Op 50940(U) [Sup Ct, Kings County June 9, 2014]. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 9:46 am by Venkat
From my perspective, the three cases demonstrate the problems with ex parte judicial oversight. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 11:28 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  If you think ROP is dignitary in part, maybe this works. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 6:44 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The problem here is that the trial court questioned the juror outside the presence of the parties, and there is no indication the parties consented to the court's decision to immediately dismiss the juror following the ex parte conversation about his literacy. [read post]