Search for: "Ex Parte Williams" Results 241 - 260 of 1,286
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Feb 2021, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
A January 26 piece asserts confidently that “[t]he Supreme Court has ruled that the Constitution gives presidents unlimited authority to grant pardons,” but the link embedded in “pardons” leads to another Times column that does not support that assertion.What these journalists seem to be relying upon, other than citing each other’s unsourced assertions, is the Court’s 1866 decision in Ex Parte Garland. [read post]
13 Feb 2021, 5:24 pm
  These remarks are quite telling for a nation embedded in cultures that values the therapeutic ("In 1909 when Sigmunf Freud, Carl Jung, William James, G. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 11:53 am by Philip Bobbitt
“Read as part of this more natural sequence,” he writes, “the removal language of Article II places no necessary restriction on the class of officials who may be impeached, convicted and penalized” (emphasis added ). [read post]
10 Feb 2021, 4:58 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Black was a lawyer in the 1876 case of ex–Secretary of War William Belknap, in which the Senate voted 37–29 against Black's arguments and in favor of jurisdiction). [read post]
4 Feb 2021, 9:00 pm by Dean Falvy
Whatever their qualifications to defend an embattled ex-president against grave constitutional charges on the nation’s biggest stage, the two men had one thing in common that undoubtedly helped them to act quickly. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 3:00 pm by Josh Blackman
And second, as part of a more modern consensus understanding, there are private offenses. [read post]
31 Jan 2021, 11:55 am by Eugene Volokh
Next is the impeachment and trial of ex-secretary of war William Belknap in 1876. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 4:24 am by Will Baude
But it has done so in the past, most famously in the case of ex-Secretary of War William Belknap, and for reasons adequately covered by others I think that is proper. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 2:56 am by INFORRM
Sullivan Ohio State Law Journal, Forthcoming, Roger Williams Univ. [read post]
7 Jan 2021, 3:23 pm by Hanlon Law, PA
Due to the fact that the judge had ex parte communications with the State Attorney’s office regarding another matter in which a defendant was charged with DUI, they each filed motions for disqualification. [read post]
27 Dec 2020, 9:06 pm by Series of Essays
OECD Evaluation of EU Regulatory Policies January 20, 2020 | Christiane Arndt-Bascle, Paul Davidson, Benjamin Gerloff, and Rebecca Schultz, Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development The Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development has assessed all European Union countries’ use of stakeholder engagement, regulatory impact assessment, and ex post evaluation to improve the quality of laws and regulations, drawing on its composite indicators of regulatory policy and… [read post]
27 Dec 2020, 8:30 am by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
Para ello, es imprescindible que la parte demandante establezca mediante prueba los siguientes requisitos: 1) la existencia de una acción u omisión culposa o negligente; 2) la antijuricidad de la misma; 3) la producción de un daño; y 4) la relación causal entre la acción u omisión y el daño(14). [read post]
24 Dec 2020, 2:05 pm by Hanlon Law, PA
The Trial and Sentencing It is reported that the defendant and the victim, his ex-girlfriend, were estranged, and the defendant was subject to a restraining order that prohibited him from contacting the victim. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 8:30 am by Eugene Volokh
First, from the Marietta Daily Journal (Ross Williams), describing the basis for the $1.5 million verdict: Alpha OB/GYN … for years the target of sign-waving protesters, and was even the victim of arson in 2012. [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 5:23 am by Derek T. Muller
And this is the part of the concurring opinion where Justice Neil Gorsuch, the only other justice who joined part of Justice Thomas’s approach, did not join.Here’s what Justice Elena Kagan (for eight justices) had to say about the clause:Article II, § 1’s appointments power gives the States far-reaching authority over presidential electors, absent some other constitutional constraint. [read post]