Search for: "Ex parte Birmingham"
Results 61 - 80
of 130
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Apr 2007, 3:34 am
Birmingham Board of Educ. (2005) -- Title IX Liability for RetaliationRompilla v. [read post]
22 Aug 2014, 10:00 pm
Citing the holding in Ex parte Publix Supermarkets, Inc., the Court noted that just as a trial court may not award an employee medical benefits based on an allegation and a motion, a trial court cannot terminate an employee’s right to medical benefits based on allegations in a motion. [read post]
1 Mar 2015, 10:00 pm
On February 27, 2015, the Alabama Court of Appeals released its decision in Ex parte Fairhope Health & Rehab, LLC. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 3:09 pm
R v Brent London Borough council ex parte Sadiq (2001) 33 H.L.R 47 held that a council could not reverse its own earlier s.184 decision. [read post]
11 Jan 2020, 8:19 pm
Prior to the close of trial, the judge gave a charge to the jury, stating in part, “You have heard testimony regarding crimes, wrongs or bad acts regarding the defendant. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 10:58 am
The justice secretary, Ken Clarke, is planning a further significant expansion in the use of tagging as part of his drive to improve public confidence in alternatives to prison. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 12:53 pm
The Court of Appeal reviewed the main authorities R v Hillingdon London Borough Council ex p Puhlhofer (1986) AC 484 (‘Puhlhofer‘), which concerned the interpretation of sections 1 and 4 of the Housing (Homeless Persons) Act 1977 (‘the 1977 Act’), R v Brent London Borough Council ex p Awua (1996) AC 55 (‘Awua‘), which concerned Part III of the 1985 Act, and Birmingham City Council v Ali [2009] UKHL 36; (2009) 1 WLR 1506… [read post]
4 Apr 2021, 6:02 am
At a first ex-parte hearing, the injunction was granted, but at the return date, HHJ Saunders dismissed the injunction application. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 12:09 am
Birmingham Board of Educ. (2005) -- Title IX (sex discrimination) liability for retaliationRompilla v. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 4:00 am
There are some good bits (assisting the resettlement of ex-offenders/the deinstitutionalised) and some frankly barking bits (most of the rest of it). [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 4:00 am
There are some good bits (assisting the resettlement of ex-offenders/the deinstitutionalised) and some frankly barking bits (most of the rest of it). [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 12:27 am
The Guardian reports: “This afternoon St Philips chambers in Birmingham, where Grierson was a door tenant – an associated barrister working from different premises – annnounced that it had parted company with the lawyer In a tersely worded statement, James Burbidge QC, head of St Philips, said: “Robert Grierson has resigned from his position as a door tenant of St Philips chambers from the 25 March 2010. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 9:00 pm
Does 1-9 (Denver, CO)Ex Parte Order dated April 4, 2007 (Granting Ex Parte Order, But Declining to Rule that Court Order is Unnecessary)*Arista v. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 1:00 am
One of the first legislative measures of the young colony, back in 1841, drafted in part by the Birmingham born first Chief Justice, was the creation of what is now know as the High Court of New Zealand. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 9:30 pm
Islam v Secretary of State for the Home Department, R v Immigration Appeal Tribunal and Another, ex parte Shah (1999) Nora Honkala72. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 1:00 pm
But when an upstart hired one of the monopolist's ex-employees, she shared the monopolist's trade secrets. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 5:48 am
As Lord Scarman said in R v Home Secretary ex p. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 3:52 am
Secretary of State, ex parte Mullen. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 3:34 pm
Professor Rosen’s article, Funding “Non-Traditional” Military Operations: The Alluring Myth of A Presidential Power of the Purse, was cited in the following article: Seth Barrett Tillman, Ex Parte Merryman: Myth, History, and Scholarship, 224 Mil. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 5:46 pm
BIRMINGHAM POLICE DEPARTMENT, CITY OF, Defendant, BIRMINGHAM, CITY OF, THE, Defendant-Appellee. 11th Circuit.Federal jurisdiction -- Torts -- Removal of state court action to federal court -- Timeliness -- Appellate court need not decide whether defendant's notice of removal was timely in instant case because any error in failing to remand case to state court on ground that notice of removal was untimely would be procedural error and would be insufficient to warrant vacating… [read post]
