Search for: "Ex parte C.J." Results 41 - 60 of 63
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 May 2009, 10:08 am by SC Divorce and Disabilty
"The purpose of alimony is to provide the ex-spouse a substitute for the support which was incident to the former marital relationship. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 1:46 pm by Christopher Simon
Andrews, C.J., issued dissenting opinion. **552 *508 York, McRae & York, Michael D. [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
We think the relevant part of the statutes are unconstitutionally overbroad, and also unconstitutional as applied. [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 12:48 pm by The Legal Blog
The Court of probate has long being accustomed to give great weight to the presumption of due execution arising from the regularity ex facie of the testamentary paper produced where no suspicion of fraud has occurred. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 5:40 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
Evid. 901(a), 902(10).The Gillespies also objected to the admissibility of portions of the attached, authenticated records: (1) the pool supplement, which supplemented the May 1, 2002 note-purchase agreement between First Marblehead and Bank One; (2) a single page following the pool supplement (the orphan page), which the Trust asserted was included as part of the pool supplement's schedule 1 and showed that the Gillespies' note was included in those pooled for sale; (3) the DAS,… [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 11:53 am by David M. Goldman
In June 2007, a notice to creditors was published as required by section 733.2121, Florida Statutes (2006), but neither Harry’s ex-wife, Katherine Jones, nor her guardian1 were ever served with a copy of the notice. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 11:53 am by David M. Goldman
In June 2007, a notice to creditors was published as required by section 733.2121, Florida Statutes (2006), but neither Harry’s ex-wife, Katherine Jones, nor her guardian1 were ever served with a copy of the notice. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 10:06 am by The Legal Blog
Justice Dalveer BhandariSupreme Court of IndiaJustice Dalveer Bhandari and Justice H.L. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 6:51 pm
Dept. of Commerce,  Case 1:18-cv-02921 (SDNY,  Filed 15 January 2019), a federal district court determined that the Secretary of Commerce unlawfully exercised what discretionary authority the law allowed in the ways he went about directing the insertion of the citizenship question that unlawfully annoyed some stakeholders and threatened others, in part because the decision was not  "reasonable and reasonably explained. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 5:09 am by Dr. Jillian T. Weiss
" Part of the problem also appears to be that, according to the District Court, the EEOC's complaint was not properly pled, indicating perhaps some lack of expertise by the attorneys in charge.The court determined that this failure deprived the employer of the opportunity to settle the complaint. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 5:57 am by Eugene Volokh
Washington state criminalizes (among other things) “mak[ing] an electronic communication to … a third party” “with intent to harass, … torment, or embarrass any other person” if the communication is made “[a]nonymously or repeatedly. [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 4:35 pm by Chris Attig
” Let’s talk a little about Chevron, because it is critical to understand how Haas and Procopio are part of a much bigger battle over the separation of powers. [read post]