Search for: "Ex parte City of Birmingham."
Results 1 - 20
of 53
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jul 2012, 12:16 pm
May, R (on the application of) v Birmingham City Council [2012] EWHC 1399 (Admin)When can a Local Authority refuse to accept an application as homeless? [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 12:02 pm
All three appellants were appealing review decisions by Birmingham City Council. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 12:02 pm
All three appellants were appealing review decisions by Birmingham City Council. [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 7:25 am
Here are materials in Water Works Board of the City of Birmingham v. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 12:49 pm
Some of the back history of this case was in R (Kelly, Mehari and JI) v Birmingham City Council [2009] EWHC 3240 (Admin) (our note) and R (Khazai, Ebrahim, Azizi and Mirghani) v Birmingham City Council [2010] EWHC 2576 (Admin) (our note), in both of which Birmingham faced substantial criticism of their homeless procedures and gatekeeping. [read post]
4 May 2022, 1:06 pm
Mr Rutledge relied upon R v Bristol Corporation, Ex p. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 5:06 pm
High Court Birmingham District Registry 27 November 2012 [not reported elsewhere. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 5:06 pm
High Court Birmingham District Registry 27 November 2012 [not reported elsewhere. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 9:10 am
Finally, the claim in A centres on a woman who is part of a State-run “Sanctuary Scheme” to protect her from a violent ex-partner; as part of the scheme, a room in her house has been converted into a “panic room” which can be locked down in case of emergency. [read post]
15 Jun 2014, 10:00 pm
K & D Erectors, Inc. and Ex parte City of Guntersville, which previously held that employers were only responsible to reimburse an employee for services designed to improve his condition. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 8:00 am
As regards the applicability of art 6, the Supreme Court concluded that a decision of a chamber of the ECtHR was not a sufficient reason to depart from its unanimous conclusion in Ali v Birmingham City Council. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm
Hounslow v Powell; Leeds v Hall; Birmingham v Frisby [2011] UKSC 8 [This is probably a work in progress. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm
Hounslow v Powell; Leeds v Hall; Birmingham v Frisby [2011] UKSC 8 [This is probably a work in progress. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 1:55 pm
(Najim v London Borough of Enfield [2015] EWCA Civ 319; [2015] HLR 19) (…) The proper approach to be derived from such authorities, and Tranckle (R v Exeter City Council, ex p. [read post]
29 Jun 2008, 2:48 pm
Moreover, the relationship between Claimant and LQHT was contractual, which was at the core of R v Servite Houses, ex p Goldsmith [2001] LGR 55, as approved in YL v Birmingham City Council [2007] 3 WLR 112. [read post]
29 Jun 2008, 2:48 pm
Moreover, the relationship between Claimant and LQHT was contractual, which was at the core of R v Servite Houses, ex p Goldsmith [2001] LGR 55, as approved in YL v Birmingham City Council [2007] 3 WLR 112. [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 7:15 am
She referred to the Birmingham schoolgirl case, R v Birmingham City Council Ex p Equal Opportunities Commission [1989] 1 AC 1155, where a system of selection for secondary school places existed but for historical reasons it had fewer places for girls than boys. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 3:09 pm
Ms T argued that Birmingham City Council v Ali [2009] UKHL 36 supported this argument. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 12:53 pm
The Court of Appeal reviewed the main authorities R v Hillingdon London Borough Council ex p Puhlhofer (1986) AC 484 (‘Puhlhofer‘), which concerned the interpretation of sections 1 and 4 of the Housing (Homeless Persons) Act 1977 (‘the 1977 Act’), R v Brent London Borough Council ex p Awua (1996) AC 55 (‘Awua‘), which concerned Part III of the 1985 Act, and Birmingham City Council v Ali [2009] UKHL 36; (2009) 1 WLR 1506… [read post]
4 Apr 2021, 6:02 am
(Akinbolu v Hackney Borough Council (1997) 29 HLR 259 and Birmingham City Council v Qasim & Ors (2009) EWCA Civ 1080 (our note)). [read post]
