Search for: "Ex parte Garland"
Results 21 - 40
of 96
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Sep 2022, 4:00 am
Garland Bans Campaign Activity by Justice Dept. [read post]
17 Aug 2022, 8:30 am
Garland concludes that Mr. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 6:40 am
A larger, more packed crowd that could hear at higher volume, that could see Trump better, and that was part of a denser mob, with more of his most hard-core followers with weapons and body armor, would be more likely to march and fight physically, not just metaphorically. [read post]
22 Jun 2022, 4:00 am
Anderson who received an enrichment without a juristic reason: Garland v Consumers’ Gas Co, 2004 SCC 25. [read post]
8 Apr 2022, 4:00 am
The rest are only covering Legislatures or other parts of state government part time, or they are interns or support staff. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 2:07 pm
The case is United States ex rel. [read post]
23 Feb 2022, 9:01 pm
The novel part of McQuade’s memo is its careful analysis and application of the Justice Department’s “discretionary considerations. [read post]
7 Jan 2022, 3:00 am
” Garland’s remarks came as he faces pressure to do and say more about the investigation, and to focus more acutely on the actions of former President Trump and his associates. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 8:44 am
Employees and others fearful of getting reputations for litigiousness Plaintiffs suing ex-employers may worry that suing will make them look litigious, and thus turn off prospective future employers.[2] Antidiscrimination laws generally forbid employers from retaliating against people who had brought discrimination claims or engaged in whistleblowing, and "a subsequent employer may be held liable for retaliation against a current employee for engaging in protected activity at a… [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 1:03 pm
Sept. 24, 2020), granting Plaintiff's Ex Parte Motion for Administrative Relief to Proceed Under Pseudonym, id. [read post]
9 Sep 2021, 2:42 pm
Puerto Rico, ex. [read post]
1 Aug 2021, 7:21 am
“In-camera ex parte” means the trial court could review the evidence in their chambers privately without the attorneys or parties present. [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
Justice Department Issues Policy Limiting White House Contact MSN – Josh Gerstein (Politico) | Published: 7/21/2021 Attorney General Merrick Garland issued a directive seeking to limit political influence on law enforcement matters by strictly limiting contacts between Justice Department personnel and the White House. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
Lawmakers have also attempted to retroactively undo parts of initiatives approved by voters in some states. [read post]
18 Jun 2021, 4:00 am
Garland Announces Expansion of Justice Department’s Voting Rights Unit, Vowing to Scrutinize GOP-Backed Voting Restrictions and Ballot Reviews MSN – Amy Gardner and Sean Sullivan (Washington Post) | Published: 6/11/2021 Attorney General Merrick Garland pledged to double the size of the Justice Department’s voting rights enforcement staff to combat efforts to restrict ballot access and prosecute those who threaten or harm election workers. [read post]
15 Jun 2021, 11:56 am
Judge Kormann's conduct reminds me a bit of Ex Parte Merryman. [read post]
20 May 2021, 5:01 am
Yet, when Attorney General Merrick Garland appeared before the House Appropriations Committee earlier this month to highlight the key priorities in the department’s 2022 budget request, cyber did not make the list. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 9:01 pm
It is truly odd that lawyers across the political spectrum have acted as if the provision creating the pardon power is unambiguous, when it is anything but.The Supreme Court case to which naïve reporters point, 1866’s Ex Parte Garland, does indeed say that the pardon power is “unlimited,” but that opinion then very clearly describes a pardon power that is in fact limited. [read post]
26 Mar 2021, 4:00 am
National/Federal Congressional Fundraisers Lobby Corporations That Suspended Political Donations Following Capitol Riot MSN – Brian Schwartz (CNBC) | Published: 3/19/2021 Fundraisers for congressional candidates and party campaign arms have been lobbying corporations to resume donating after many suspended their political contributions. [read post]
24 Feb 2021, 9:01 pm
A January 26 piece asserts confidently that “[t]he Supreme Court has ruled that the Constitution gives presidents unlimited authority to grant pardons,” but the link embedded in “pardons” leads to another Times column that does not support that assertion.What these journalists seem to be relying upon, other than citing each other’s unsourced assertions, is the Court’s 1866 decision in Ex Parte Garland. [read post]
