Search for: "Ex parte Lange" Results 41 - 60 of 367
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2012, 1:10 am by Scott A. McKeown
Added Rebuttal Opportunity of Limited Value to Patentees When faced with a third party request for either ex parte patent (EXP) reexamination or inter partes patent (IPX) reexamination, a Patentee must sit helplessly by and await the determination of the USPTO to grant or deny the request. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 3:10 am by Scott A. McKeown
Finally, with respect to ex parte reexaminations, the SNQ standard is maintained. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 3:10 am by Scott A. McKeown
In other words, inter partes patent reexamination is subject to statutory estoppel provisions not applicable to ex parte patent reexamination. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 3:07 am by Scott A. McKeown
In re Lund Affirmed Per Curiam Last May, Ex parte Lund was decided by the Board of Patent Appeals & Interferences (BPAI) (here). [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 3:10 am by Scott A. McKeown
While ex parte patent reexamination remains an option after Patent Reform, the loss of a voice in USPTO proceedings is a significant pitfall for those not following the seemingly imminent enactment of the Patent Reform legislation. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 3:10 am by Scott A. McKeown
One might argue that the above scenario exists today, such as when ex parte patent reexamination runs in parallel. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 3:10 am by Scott A. McKeown
In ex parte reexamination, the percentage of reexaminations concluded with all claims confirmed is roughly 24% based upon USPTO statistics. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 3:10 am by Scott A. McKeown
Inter partes patent reexamination is subject to statutory estoppel provisions not applicable to ex parte patent reexamination. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 3:10 am by Stephen G. Kunin
Such a procedure would be in a similiar vein to that of the pilot program seeking waiver of the Patent Owner Statement in ex parte patent reexamination. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 1:15 am by Scott A. McKeown
So, post-AIA, the CRU will eventually be left with a docket of ex parte reexamination cases. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 4:10 am by Scott A. McKeown
Last week, Star Scientific’s ex parte patent reexaminations (90/009,372 & 90/009,375) were favorably terminated based upon responses filed in November of 2009. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 1:10 am by Scott A. McKeown
Moreover, the SNQ standard applied in SE is a very low hurdle (over 94% of SNQs are accepted by the Office in ex parte patent reexamination filings.) [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 1:15 am by Scott A. McKeown
” The primary USPTO proceeding that will be impacted by 315(e)(1) will be ex parte patent reexamination (EXP). [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 4:30 am by Scott A. McKeown
This argument makes perfect sense for ex parte patent reexamination, but perhaps less so for inter partes patent reexamination proceedings. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 7:27 am by Miquel Montañá
In the case at hand, the patentee requested the Court to order a preliminary injunction “ex parte” alleging that, otherwise, the defendant would be able to exhibit its products in a forthcoming trade fair. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 3:15 am by Scott A. McKeown
Recently, Card Activation Technologies’ update on their concluded ex parte reexamination (U.S. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 2:10 am by Scott A. McKeown
The AIPA of 1999 introduced inter partes reexamination; there was no purpose to change any aspect of ex parte patent reexamination practices. [read post]