Search for: "Ex parte Robert Thomas Mays" Results 1 - 20 of 262
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 May 2011, 2:01 pm
" Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Scalia, Kennedy, and Alito joined the opinion of Justice Thomas. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 2:24 pm by Federalist Society
The question in this case is whether, when a post-indictment ex parte restraining order freezes assets needed by a criminal defendant to hire his attorney of choice, the Fifth and Sixth Amendments require a pre-trial hearing at which the defendant may challenge the evidentiary support and legal theory upon which the government relied to freeze the assets.In a 6-3 opinion delivered by Justice Kagan, the Court held that when challenging the legality of a pre-trial asset… [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 2:24 pm by Federalist Society
The question in this case is whether, when a post-indictment ex parte restraining order freezes assets needed by a criminal defendant to hire his attorney of choice, the Fifth and Sixth Amendments require a pre-trial hearing at which the defendant may challenge the evidentiary support and legal theory upon which the government relied to freeze the assets.In a 6-3 opinion delivered by Justice Kagan, the Court held that when challenging the legality of a pre-trial asset… [read post]
11 Mar 2022, 11:39 am by Josh Blackman
But Justice Gorsuch's majority opinion suggested that state licensing officials may play some role in enforcing the law: On the briefing and argument before us, it appears that these particular defendants fall within the scope of Ex parte Young's historic exception to state sovereign immunity. [read post]
6 Aug 2007, 5:00 pm
Newsweek reported this weekend that FBI agents raided the home of a former Justice Department lawyer Thomas Tamm as part of an investigation into how the New York Times learned about the government's secret wiretapping program. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 9:52 am by Steven Schwinn - Guest
The Court this week ruled that a suit by a state agency against a state official in federal court can move forward under Ex Parte Young. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 2:30 pm
Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito joined Scalia's opinion. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 9:12 pm by lawmrh
Kagan because of her rah-rah interest while part of Obama’s White House and Thomas because of his Liberty Central Inc. [read post]
26 May 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
It was the first time Roberts directly addressed growing concern about how the justices handle potential conflicts-of-interest with their personal lives, a topic that has gotten renewed attention amid a series of alleged ethical infringements by Justice Clarence Thomas. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 1:27 pm by Rory Little
  (Justice Thomas, as is his normal practice, said nothing at argument.) [read post]
17 May 2011, 4:32 am by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
 The Supreme Court reversed per Justice Thomas, writing for himself, Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Scalia, Kennedy and Alito. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 9:50 am by Mark Walsh
Justice Thomas has concurred in the judgment in part and dissented in part. [read post]
6 Aug 2007, 8:43 pm
Per Wired, some 'Righty bloggers' went to work upon Newsweek reporting this weekend of FBI agents raiding the home of former Justice Department lawyer Thomas Tamm as part of an investigation into how the New York Times learned about the government's secret wiretapping program. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 10:52 am by CJLF Staff
Chief Justice John Roberts said the state simply wants to notify federal authorities that they have someone in their custody who may be in the country illegally. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 5:30 am by Josh Blackman
GORSUCH, J., filed an opinion concurring in the judgment in part and dissenting in part, in which THOMAS, J., joined as to Part II. [read post]